BINGHAMTON, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: COOK FOAM PRODUCTS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COOK FOAM PRODUCTS, INC. in 700 CONKLIN ROAD, BINGHAMTON, NY 13903 (NAICS 326150). OSHA activity number 339650988.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COOK FOAM PRODUCTS, INC.
- Site address
- 700 CONKLIN ROAD
- City
- BINGHAMTON
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13903
- Mailing
- 700 CONKLIN ROAD, BINGHAMTON, NY 13903
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326150
- Employees
- 17
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)), on all open sides: a) At the mezzanine area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employees were retrieving products from the mezzanine which did not provided adequate guarding exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.37 B04
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent: a) At the facility, on or about 3/27/2014: The designated fire exit sign could not be clearly seen from all areas at the production floor and no signs indicating the direction of travel to exit were posted.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a) At the facility, on or about 3/27/2014: Employees were performing servicing and or maintenance on various machinery or equipment such as: hydraulic presses, vertical saws, Baler among others without using procedures, exposing employees to struck-by and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1300
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees: a) At the facility, on or about 3/27/2014: Employees were performing servicing and or maintenance on various machinery or equipment such as: hydraulic presses, vertical saws, Baler among others without training, exposing employees to struck-by and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a) At the battery charging area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was adding water to battery containing acid and the battery charging area was not equipped with an eye wash station.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: a) At the production floor, on or about 3/27/2014: Employees were operating a Yale fork truck without the operator been evaluated in the last three years.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s) a) At the production floor, on or about 3/27/2014: Employees were operating a Yale fork truck which was missing its rear view mirrors.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,820 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Edge Sweet Vertical Saw Model CL-3 to cut foam boards without guarding the unused portion of the blade. b) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Edge Sweet Vertical Saw Model C-2 to cut foam boards without guarding the unused portion of the blade. c) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Edge Sweet Vertical Saw Model EL-3 to cut foam boards without guarding the unused portion of the blade. d) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Edge Sweet Vertical Saw Model A-2 to cut foam boards without guarding the unused portion of the blade. e) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Selco Baler with its interlock bypass, exposing the employee to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1820
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Blue hydraulic press with no point of operation guarding. b) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Blue hydraulic press with no point of operation guarding on the back side. c) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Cream/Green hydraulic press with an inadequate guarding on the back side.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: a) At the production floor, on or about 3/27/2013: Employees were operating a hydraulic press from the control box which had unused opening, exposing employees to a shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections at Cook Foam Products, INC.
View Cook Foam Products, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326150)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339650988.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.