Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: COOK FOAM PRODUCTS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COOK FOAM PRODUCTS, INC. in 700 CONKLIN ROAD, BINGHAMTON, NY 13903 (NAICS 326150). OSHA activity number 339650988.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cook Foam Products, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cook Foam Products, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
700 CONKLIN ROAD
City
BINGHAMTON
State
NY
ZIP
13903
Mailing
700 CONKLIN ROAD, BINGHAMTON, NY 13903
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326150
Employees
17
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Sep 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)), on all open sides:  a) At the mezzanine area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employees were retrieving products from the mezzanine which did not provided adequate guarding exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1040
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.37 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Sep 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent:  a) At the facility, on or about 3/27/2014: The designated fire exit sign could not be clearly seen from all areas at the production floor and no signs indicating the direction of travel to exit were posted.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1040
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Sep 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  a) At the facility, on or about 3/27/2014: Employees were performing servicing and or maintenance on various machinery or equipment such as: hydraulic presses, vertical saws, Baler among others without using procedures, exposing employees to struck-by and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1300
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Sep 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:  a) At the facility, on or about 3/27/2014: Employees were performing servicing and or maintenance on various machinery or equipment such as: hydraulic presses, vertical saws, Baler among others without training, exposing employees to struck-by and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Sep 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  a) At the battery charging area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was adding water to battery containing acid and the battery charging area was not equipped with an eye wash station.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1040
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Sep 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  a) At the production floor, on or about 3/27/2014: Employees were operating a Yale fork truck without the operator been evaluated in the last three years.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1040
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.178 P01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Sep 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s)  a) At the production floor, on or about 3/27/2014: Employees were operating a Yale fork truck which was missing its rear view mirrors.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Aug 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,820 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Edge Sweet Vertical Saw Model CL-3 to cut foam boards without guarding the unused portion of the blade.   b) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Edge Sweet Vertical Saw Model C-2 to cut foam boards without guarding the unused portion of the blade.   c) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Edge Sweet Vertical Saw Model EL-3 to cut foam boards without guarding the unused portion of the blade.   d) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Edge Sweet Vertical Saw Model A-2 to cut foam boards without guarding the unused portion of the blade.   e) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Selco Baler with its interlock bypass, exposing the employee to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1820
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Sep 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  a) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Blue hydraulic press with no point of operation guarding.    b) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Blue hydraulic press with no point of operation guarding on the back side.    c) At the production area, on or about 3/27/2014: Employee was operating a Cream/Green hydraulic press with an inadequate guarding on the back side.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Aug 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  a) At the production floor, on or about 3/27/2013: Employees were operating a hydraulic press from the control box which had unused opening, exposing employees to a shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1040
  • · Z (S) $1600

View Cook Foam Products, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339650988.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.