Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: COOK FOAM PRODUCTS, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of COOK FOAM PRODUCTS, INC. in 700 CONKLIN ROAD, BINGHAMTON, NY 13903 (NAICS 326150). OSHA activity number 339738122.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cook Foam Products, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cook Foam Products, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
700 CONKLIN ROAD
City
BINGHAMTON
State
NY
ZIP
13903
Mailing
700 CONKLIN ROAD, BINGHAMTON, NY 13903
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326150
Employees
40
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1052 C02

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Aug 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,275 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(c)(2): The employer did not ensure that no employee was exposed to an airborne concentration of methylene chloride in excess of 125 parts per million as determined over a sampling period of 15 minutes:    (a) Foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014: An employee spraying Helmiprene 1533 adhesive was exposed to a 15 minute short term exposure of methylene chloride at 408.5 parts per million (ppm); or 3.27 times the STEL of 125 ppm during the 15 minute sampling period.     (b) Foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014: An employee spraying Helmiprene 1533 adhesive was exposed to a 15 minute short term exposure of methylene chloride at 160.7 parts per million (ppm); or 1.28 times the STEL of 125 ppm during the 15 minute sampling period.     (c) Foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014: An employee spraying Helmiprene 1533 adhesive was exposed to a 15 minute short term exposure of methylene chloride at 324.8 parts per million (ppm); or 2.59 times the STEL of 125 ppm during the 15 minute sampling period.    (d) Foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014: An employee spraying Helmiprene 1533 adhesive was exposed to a 15 minute short term exposure of methylene chloride at 361.6 parts per million (ppm); or 2.89 times the STEL of 125 ppm during the 15 minute sampling period.      (e) Foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014: An employee spraying Helmiprene 1533 adhesive was exposed to a 15 minute short term exposure of methylene chloride at 251.5 parts per million (ppm); or 2.01 times the STEL of 125 ppm during the 15 minute sampling period.      Abatement documentation must be submitted for these items.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2275
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.1052 F01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Aug 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(f)(1): The employer did not institute and maintain the effectiveness of engineering controls and work practices to reduce employee exposure to or below the permissible exposure limits and wherever the feasible engineering controls and work practices which can be instituted were not sufficient to reduce employee exposure to or below the 8-hour time weighted average permissible exposure limit or short term exposure limit, the employer did not use them to reduce employee exposure to the lowest levels achievable and did not supplement them by the use of respiratory protection that compiled with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1052(g):     (a) Foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014: Engineering controls and work practices to reduce employee exposure to methylene chloride to the lowest achievable levels were not provided for employees spraying Helmiprene 1533 adhesive.  See Citation 1, Item 1a for exposure results.       Abatement documentation must be submitted for these items.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1052 G01 I

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Aug 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(g)(1)(i): Respirators were not used during periods when an employee's exposure to methylene chloride exceeds the 8-hour time weighted average permissible exposure limit or short term exposure limit:    (a) Foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014: A respirator was not provided to employees exposed above the short term exposure limit for methylene chloride while spraying Helmiprene 1533 adhesive.  See Citation 1, Item 1a for exposure results.    Abatement documentation must be submitted for these items.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1052 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Aug 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(g)(2)(i): The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134 (b) through (m) (except (d)(1)(iii)), which covers each employee required by 29 CFR 1910.1052 to use a respirator:    (a) Foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014: The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program for three assemblers who were overexposed to methylene chloride.    Abatement documentation must be submitted for these items.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1052 J01 I

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Sep 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(j)(1)(i): The employer did not make medical surveillance available for employees who were or potentially were  exposed to methylene chloride at or above the action level on 30 or more days per year, or above the 8-hour time weighted average permissible exposure limit or the short term exposure limit on 10 or more days per year:    (a) Foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014: There was no medical surveillance for three employees who were overexposed to methylene chloride, above the STEL of 125 ppm.     Abatement documentation must be submitted for these items.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1052 D02

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,820 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(2): The employer did not perform initial monitoring to determine each employee's exposure to methylene chloride:     (a) Foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014: The employer had done no initial monitoring for employees spraying Helmiprene 1533, an adhesive containing 60-100% methylene chloride by weight.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1820
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1052 E01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Jul 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(e)(1): The employer did not establish a regulated area wherever an employee's exposure to airborne concentrations of methylene chloride exceeded or could reasonably be expected to exceed either the 8-hour Time Weighted Average Permissible Exposure Limit or the Short Term Exposure Limit:  (a) Foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014: There was no regulated area established where employees were exposed to methylene chloride above the STEL of 125 ppm.   Abatement certification must be submitted.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1052 K01 I

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,365 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(k)(1)(i): The employer did not comply with all requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (1910.1200) for MC:    (a) At the foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014: The employees spraying Helmiprene 1533 adhesive were exposed to methylene chloride and were not informed about the health hazards from acute and chronic exposure to methylene chloride, and all other requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard.     Abatement certification must be submitted for these items.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1365
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.1052 L01

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(l)(1): The employer did not provide information and training for each affected employee prior to or at the time of initial assignment to a job involving potential exposure to methylene chloride:  (a) At the foam assembly department, on or about June 2, 2014:  At the time of the inspection, the employees exposed to methylene chloride had not been provided with adequate information and training about hazardous acute and chronic exposure to methylene chloride.  Abatement certification must be submitted for these items.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:  (a) At the facility, on or about June 2, 2014: The employer did not perform a hazard assessment to determine mandatory personal protective equipment nor verify that information through a written certification of the evaluation.    Abatement certification must be submitted for these items.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Cook Foam Products, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339738122.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.