Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J. LINDSLEY ROOFING, LLC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J. LINDSLEY ROOFING, LLC. in STAR NAIL SALON, 109 EAST BROADWAY, FULTON, NY 13069 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339659203.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J. Lindsley Roofing, LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J. Lindsley Roofing, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
STAR NAIL SALON, 109 EAST BROADWAY
City
FULTON
State
NY
ZIP
13069
Mailing
1002 STATE ROUTE 176, FULTON, NY 13069
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions:    a) Entire roof, on or about 4-2-14:  Five employees were working with adhesives, mastics, and sealants, without the PPE required to protect hands and exposed skin.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.59

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.59: 29 CFR 1926.59:  An employer engaged in construction activities did not comply with the requirements set forth in Part 1910, Section 1200, Hazard Communication:    a) Entire worksite, on or about 4-2-14:  Five employees were working with adhesives, mastics, and sealants, without a hazard communication program or MSDS sheets available.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a) Entire roof, on or about 4-2-14:  Five employees were working with adhesives, mastics, and sealants, without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.150 C01 VI

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(vi): A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 10B, was not provided within 50 feet of wherever more than 5 gallons of flammable or combustible liquids or 5 pounds of flammable gas were being used on the jobsite:     a) Entire roof, on or about 4-2-14:  Five employees were using flammable liquids (adhesive) while working on a roof, without a fire extinguisher.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system:    a) Entire roof, on or about 4-2-14:  Five employees were working on a flat roof and were not protected from falls, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 20 feet 6 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    a) West side of building, on or about 4-2-14:  Employees were accessing the roof via an extension ladder that was extended 25 inches above the landing surface, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 9 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.403 B02

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:       a) Northwest side of building, on or about 4-2-14:  Employees were operating power tools and equipment that were plugged into a relocatable power tap (RPT) that was not being used in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations or as listed and labeled.       b) North side of building, inside, on or about 4-2-14:  Employees were operating power tools and equipment that were plugged into a relocatable power tap (RPT) that was not being used in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations or as listed and labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.404 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii): On a construction site, where an assured equipment grounding program was not utilized, all 120-volt, single-phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which are in use by employees did not have approved ground fault circuit interrupters for personal protection:    a) Northwest side of building, on or about 4-2-14:  Employees were operating power tools and equipment that were powered through a receptacle that was not protected by a ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI).     b) North side of building, inside, on or about 4-2-14:  Employees were operating power tools and equipment that were powered through a receptacle that was not protected by a ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:    a) Northwest corner of building, on or about 4-2-14:  Employees were operating power tools and equipment that were plugged into two cords that did not have a continuous path to ground due to missing ground pins.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View J. Lindsley Roofing, LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339659203.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.