RIDGEWOOD, NY —
OSHA Inspection: GO NEW YORK TOURS INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GO NEW YORK TOURS INC. in 74 ONDERDONK AVE., RIDGEWOOD, NY 11385 (NAICS 487110). OSHA activity number 339672933.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GO NEW YORK TOURS INC.
- Site address
- 74 ONDERDONK AVE.
- City
- RIDGEWOOD
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 11385
- Mailing
- 2 EAST 42ND STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10017
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 487110
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 B01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Abate by
- May 7, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(b)(1): At least two exits routes were not available to permit prompt evacuation of employees during an emergency. (a) Rear of Building - Two exit signs identified the exit as a steel roll up garage door. The exit route was not viable. No exit door existed; on or about 04/08/14. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $ 1,000.00 AS PER 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Abate by
- May 7, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": Front of the building - The exit door was not marked with a sign; on or about 04/08/14. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.252 B02 III
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Abate by
- May 7, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields: (a) In the garage area - Employees going to and from the store room, bathroom and break area were not protected from rays; on or about 04/08/14. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a): The workplace was not kept clean and orderly and in a sanitary condition; (a) The bathroom - Surfaces were not kept clean. No soap and towels were provided; on or about 04/08/14.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.141 C01 I
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(c)(1)(i): When toilet rooms were intended to be occupied by no more than one person at a time, the rooms were not provided with an adequate lock capable of being secured on the inside: (a) In the bathroom - The toilet room could not be locked because there was no door for privacy; on or about 04/18/14.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) In the garage area - A written respiratory protection program was not established for an employee who was required to wear a half-mask respirator to spray paint; on or about 04/08/14.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) In the garage area - An employee who was required to wear a half-mask respirator to spray paint and were not medically evaluated; on or about 04/08/14.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (a) In the garage area - An employee who waw required to wear half-mask respirators to spray paint was not fit tested; on or about 04/08/14. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to employees who are required to wear respirators in accordance with this paragraph: (a) In the garage area - An employee who was required to wear half mask respirators to spray paint was not provided training; on or about 04/08/14.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.252 A02 II
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(a)(2)(ii): Suitable extinguishing equipment was not maintained in a state of readiness for instant use: (a) By the welding station - The fire extinguisher was last inspected in September of 2011; on or about 04/08/14.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) At the worksite - The employer did not maintain a written Hazard Communication Program for chemicals such as, but not limited to motor oil, windshield washer fluid, anti-freeze, brake cleaner gear oil and U-Tech 200 Acrylic Urethane; on or about 03/08/14.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used: (a) At the worksite - The employer did not maintain material safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to motor oil, windshield washer fluid, anti-freeze, brake cleaner, gear oil and U-Tech 200 Acrylic Urethane; on or about 04/08/14.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced in the worklplace. (a) At the worksite - Employee who used hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, to motor oil, windshield washer fluid, anti-freeze, brake cleaner, gear oil and U-Tech 200 Acrylic Urtehane; on or about 04/08/14.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at GO NEW York Tours INC.
View GO NEW York Tours INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 487110)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339672933.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.