Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: IFCO SYSTEMS N.A., INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of IFCO SYSTEMS N.A., INC. in 515 HIGHLAND DRIVE, VALDOSTA, GA 31601 (NAICS 321920). OSHA activity number 339673808.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ifco Systems N.A., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ifco Systems N.A., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
515 HIGHLAND DRIVE
City
VALDOSTA
State
GA
ZIP
31601
Mailing
13100 NORTHWEST FREEWAY, HOUSTON, TX 77040
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321920
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2014
Abate by
Sep 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:    (a)  In the Shop Area, on or about June 3, 2014 and at times prior to, the employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program for an employee who was exposed to noise at 338% of the action level (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of 98.8 dBA during the 396 minute sampling period, resulting in a noise hazard.    (b)  In the Shop Area, on or about June 3, 2014 and at times prior to, the employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program for an employee who was exposed to noise at 242% of the action level (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of 96.3 dBA during the 400 minute sampling period, resulting in a noise hazard.    (c)  In the Shop Area, on or about June 3, 2014 and at times prior to, the employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program for an employee who was exposed to noise at 156% of the action level (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of 93.2 dBA during the 409 minute sampling period, resulting in a noise hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5500

1910.95 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2014
Abate by
Sep 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:  (a)  In the Shop Area, on or about June 3, 2014 and at times prior to, the employer did not implement a noise monitoring program for an employee who was exposed to noise at 339% of the action level (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of 98.8 dBA during the 396 minute sampling period, resulting in a noise hazard.  (b)  In the Shop Area, on or about June 3, 2014and at times prior to, the employer did not implement a noise monitoring program for an employee who was exposed to noise at 242% of the action level (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of 96.3 dBA during the 400 minute sampling period, resulting in a noise hazard.  (c)  In the Shop Area, on or about June 3, 2014 and at times prior to, the employer did not implement a noise monitoring program for an employee who was exposed to noise at 156% of the action level (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of 93.2 dBA during the 409 minute sampling period, resulting in a noise hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2014
Abate by
Sep 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  (a)  Throughout the facility, on or about June 3, 2014 and at times prior to, the employer did not provide basic advisory information contained in Appendix D to employees who used filtering facepiece respirators on a voluntary basis, resulting in a respiratory and dermal hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Ifco Systems N.A., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339673808.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.