ONEIDA, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: S & M TOOL, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of S & M TOOL, INC. in 3831 W. MASON ST., ONEIDA, WI 54155 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339675092.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- S & M TOOL, INC.
- Site address
- 3831 W. MASON ST.
- City
- ONEIDA
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54155
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 12558, GREEN BAY, WI 54307
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 17
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a) The employer did not establish elements of an energy control program for employees performing work on machines that would require lockout/tagout or equivalent protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts: a) Two horizontal lathes did not have a chuck guards to protect employees from entanglement hazards caused from the rotating part.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a) CNC operated vertical lathes and mills did not have interlocked doors to prevent employees from accessing the danger area of the machines during operation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) Pulleys on a Bridgeport mill head were not guarded to prevent employees from accessing the pinch point and rotating part.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.219 E01 I
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs seven feet or less from the floor level were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least fifteen inches above the belt: a) Horizontal belts on a Bridgeport mill head were not guarded to prevent employees from accessing the pinch points created between the belts and pulleys.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: a) A forklift operator did not have an evaluation since his training in 2008.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at S & M Tool, INC.
View S & M Tool, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339675092.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.