Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: S & M TOOL, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of S & M TOOL, INC. in 3831 W. MASON ST., ONEIDA, WI 54155 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339675092.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch S & M Tool, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for S & M Tool, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
S & M TOOL, INC.
Site address
3831 W. MASON ST.
City
ONEIDA
State
WI
ZIP
54155
Mailing
P.O. BOX 12558, GREEN BAY, WI 54307
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
17
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 12 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Abate by
Aug 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    a) The employer did not establish elements of an energy control program for employees performing work on machines that would require lockout/tagout or equivalent protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 12 instances 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts:    a) Two horizontal lathes did not have a chuck guards to protect employees from entanglement hazards caused from the rotating part.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 12 instances 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Abate by
Feb 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    a) CNC operated vertical lathes and mills did not have interlocked doors to prevent employees from accessing the danger area of the machines during operation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    a) Pulleys on a Bridgeport mill head were not guarded to prevent employees from accessing the pinch point and rotating part.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs seven feet or less from the floor level were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least fifteen inches above the belt:  a) Horizontal belts on a Bridgeport mill head were not guarded to prevent employees from accessing the pinch points created between the belts and pulleys.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Abate by
Jul 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  a) A forklift operator did not have an evaluation since his training in 2008.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View S & M Tool, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339675092.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.