Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: RED ROOF INN

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RED ROOF INN in 5021 EASTPOINTE DR., MEDINA, OH 44256 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 339745937.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RED Roof INN for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RED Roof INN is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RED ROOF INN
Site address
5021 EASTPOINTE DR.
City
MEDINA
State
OH
ZIP
44256
Mailing
5021 EASTPOINTE DR., MEDINA, OH 44256
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
12
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2014
Abate by
Nov 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  On or about October 16, 2014, the employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Items 1-3 and Citation 2 Item 1 for hazards associated with the following:  (a)  Employee exposure to corrosives and inadequate eye wash station;  (b)  Employee exposure to bloodborne pathogens and lack of exposure control plan;  (c)  Employee exposure to hazardous chemicals and lack of hazard communication program/training; and,  (d)  Lack of certification of personal protective equipment (PPE) assessment where PPE is required for protection against hazards in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $400

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2014
Abate by
Jun 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c):  Where eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drench or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided with the work area for immediate emergency use:    On or about April 28, 2014, the employer had not provided adequate, suitable eye wash/quick drench facilities, with a minimum 15 minutes of flushing capability, in the laundry facility at or near where corrosive chemicals such as, but not limited to bleach, detergents, and fabric softeners are distributed/dispensed to the laundry processing equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1030 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2014
Abate by
Jun 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1):  The employer, having a employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section, had not established a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:  On or about April 28, 2014,  the employer had not established the Exposure Control Plan as required for the employees with occupational exposure including, but not limited to, the housekeeping and the laundry room staff.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2014
Abate by
Jun 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer had not developed, implemented, or maintained a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section will be met:  On or about April 28. 2014, the employer had not compiled and made available to the workers a written hazard communication program for hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to; the cleaning chemicals, laundry detergents, fabric softeners, and other chemicals in use on site.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2014
Abate by
Jun 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):  Employee training did not include at least an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer and the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  On or about April 28, 2014,  the employer had not provided the detailed training as required for hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to; the cleaning chemicals, laundry detergents, fabric softeners, and other chemicals in use on site.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2014
Abate by
Jun 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  The required workplace hazard assessment was not certified as being performed, identifying the person completing the assessment, and written certification of the date of the assessment:  On or about April 28, 2014, the workplace assessment, designed to identify personal protective equipment (PPE) needed by employees to prevent injury, was not certified as being performed.    NOTE:  The assessment shall be written, titled, dated and certified by signature.  The required documented training shall include the following:    1)      When PPE is necessary; 2)      What PPE is necessary; 3)      Limitations of the PPE; 4)      How to properly wear and use the PPE, and 5)      Inspection and care of the PPE
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View RED Roof INN's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339745937.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.