Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROAD RUNNER CONSTRUCTION INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ROAD RUNNER CONSTRUCTION INC. in 5224 COMMERCE PLACE, PONTOON BEACH, IL 62040 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339761819.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Road Runner Construction INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Road Runner Construction INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5224 COMMERCE PLACE
City
PONTOON BEACH
State
IL
ZIP
62040
Mailing
PO BOX 55601, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72227
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Deleted Other-than-serious 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Jan 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  a)  For Citation 1, Item 1a, issued on 10/21/2014 with an abatement date of 11/17/2014, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  b)  For Citation 1, Item 1b, issued on 10/21/2014 with an abatement date of 11/17/2014, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  c)  For Citation 1, Item 3, issued on 10/21/2014 with an abatement date of 10/27/2014, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  d)  For Citation 1, Item 4, issued on 10/21/2014 with an abatement date of 10/27/2014, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  e)  For Citation 2, Item 1, issued on 10/21/2014 with an abatement date of 11/17/2014, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $400

1903.19 D01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Jan 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a)  For Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 10/21/2014 with an abatement date of 10/27/2014, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2014
Abate by
Nov 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part:   On or about May 9, 2014, employees working on second floor level, 12 foot high, flat surface,  were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to control and eliminate the hazards present at the jobsite in accordance with OSHA regulations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2014
Abate by
Nov 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):      On or about May 9, 2014, employees working on second floor level, 12 foot high, flat surface,  were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2014
Abate by
Oct 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:        On the second story floor of the wood frame building, employees were exposed to 12 foot fall hazard, while working at that level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2014
Abate by
Oct 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:       An employee was on the fifth step of the 8 foot fiberglass step ladder to access higher elevations, while the ladder was leaned against the wall.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2014
Abate by
Oct 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:     An employee was standing the top step of the 8 foot fiberglass step ladder to access higher elevations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.602 D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 21, 2014
Abate by
Nov 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l):     The employer had not certified the operator of the JLG Telehandler machine had been trained and was competent to run the equipment in a safe manner.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Road Runner Construction INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339761819.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.