KANSAS CITY, MO —
OSHA Inspection: BROCK GRAIN SYSTEMS, A DIV. OF CTB, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of BROCK GRAIN SYSTEMS, A DIV. OF CTB, INC. in 7400 EAST 13TH STREET, KANSAS CITY, MO 64126 (NAICS 332311). OSHA activity number 339787673.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Brock Grain Systems, a DIV. of CTB, INC. — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brock Grain Systems, a DIV. of CTB, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BROCK GRAIN SYSTEMS, A DIV. OF CTB, INC.
- Site address
- 7400 EAST 13TH STREET
- City
- KANSAS CITY
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64126
- Mailing
- 7400 EAST 13TH STREET, KANSAS CITY, MO 64126
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332311
- Employees
- 85
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: (a) At Brock Grain System: The employer failed to have an effective Hearing Conservation Program. (1) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 106% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 501 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (2) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 87% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.0 dBA. The sampling was performed for 513 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (3) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 119% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 501 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (4) An employee working at the farm A line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 75% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 512 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (5) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 89% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 520 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (6) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 120% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.3 dBA. The sampling was performed for 475 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (7) An employee working at the Farm A was exposed to continuous noise levels at 53% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 85.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 468 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (8) An employee working at the Floor was exposed to continuous noise levels at 100% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.0 dBA. The sampling was performed for 486 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (9) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 77% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 88.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 448 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (10) An employee working at the Floor line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 72.9% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.7 dBA. The sampling was performed for 480 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $6,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: (a) At Brock Grain System: The employer did not develop a monitoring program. (1) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 106% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 501 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (2) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 87% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.0 dBA. The sampling was performed for 513 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (3) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 119% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 501 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (4) An employee working at the farm A line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 75% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 512 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (5) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 89% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 520 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (6) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 120% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.3 dBA. The sampling was performed for 475 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (7) An employee working at the Farm A was exposed to continuous noise levels at 53% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 85.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 468 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (8) An employee working at the Floor was exposed to continuous noise levels at 100% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.0 dBA. The sampling was performed for 486 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (9) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 77% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 88.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 448 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (10) An employee working at the Floor line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 72.9% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.7 dBA. The sampling was performed for 480 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $6000
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): (a) At Brock Grain Systems: The Personal Protective Equipment Hazardous Evaluation did not take into consideration the levels of noise at the workplace. (1) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 106% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 501 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (2) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 87% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.0 dBA. The sampling was performed for 513 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (3) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 119% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 501 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (4) An employee working at the farm A line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 75% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 512 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (5) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 89% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 520 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (6) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 120% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.3 dBA. The sampling was performed for 475 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (7) An employee working at the Farm A was exposed to continuous noise levels at 53% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 85.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 468 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (8) An employee working at the Floor was exposed to continuous noise levels at 100% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.0 dBA. The sampling was performed for 486 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (9) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 77% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 88.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 448 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (10) An employee working at the Floor line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 72.9% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.7 dBA. The sampling was performed for 480 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 I02 II
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that hearing protectors are worn by any employee who is exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels or greater: (a) At Brock Grain System: The employer did not enforce the mandatory use of hearing protection (1) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 106% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 501 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (2) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 87% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.0 dBA. The sampling was performed for 513 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (3) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 119% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 501 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (4) An employee working at the farm A line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 75% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 512 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (5) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 89% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 520 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (6) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 120% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.3 dBA. The sampling was performed for 475 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (7) An employee working at the Farm A was exposed to continuous noise levels at 53% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 85.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 468 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (8) An employee working at the Floor was exposed to continuous noise levels at 100% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.0 dBA. The sampling was performed for 486 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (9) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 77% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 88.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 448 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (10) An employee working at the Floor line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 72.9% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.7 dBA. The sampling was performed for 480 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.95 K03 II
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(3)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each employee was informed of the purpose of hearing protectors, the advantages, disadvantages, and attenuation of various types, and instructions on selection, fitting, use and care: A. At Brock Grain System: The hearing training offer to the employees do not emphasize in the difference between the types of hearing protection and the correct way of wear ear plugs. (1) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 106% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 501 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (2) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 87% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.0 dBA. The sampling was performed for 513 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (3) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 119% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 501 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (4) An employee working at the farm A line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 75% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 512 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (5) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 89% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 520 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (6) An employee working at the body line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 120% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.3 dBA. The sampling was performed for 475 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (7) An employee working at the Farm A was exposed to continuous noise levels at 53% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 85.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 468 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (8) An employee working at the Floor was exposed to continuous noise levels at 100% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.0 dBA. The sampling was performed for 486 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (9) An employee working at the bliss line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 77% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 88.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 448 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014. (10) An employee working at the Floor line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 72.9% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.7 dBA. The sampling was performed for 480 minutes during one shift on June 5, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4000
More inspections at Brock Grain Systems, a DIV. of CTB, INC.
View Brock Grain Systems, a DIV. of CTB, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332311)
Jun 26, 2026
J Perez Metal INC · BERRYVILLE, VA
Jun 23, 2026
Parkline INC. · ELEANOR, WV
Jun 18, 2026
Kingspan Insulated Panels, INC. · MODESTO, CA
Jun 16, 2026
NVS Moving & Storage LLC · EASTON, PA
Jun 16, 2026
Mid-State Machine and Fabricating Corp. · LAKELAND, FL
More inspections in MO
Jul 17, 2026
United Parcel Service · SAINT LOUIS, MO
Jul 15, 2026
Triple J Construction, LLC. · PLATTE CITY, MO
Jul 14, 2026
Torchylo Builders, LLC. · CLINTON, MO
Jul 13, 2026
Jorge Merida · BLUE SPRINGS, MO
Jul 9, 2026
Niagara Bottling · KANSAS CITY, MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339787673.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.