HARTFORD, WI —
OSHA Inspection: HARTFORD FINISHING, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HARTFORD FINISHING, INC. in 844 W STATE STREET, HARTFORD, WI 53027 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 339796500.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HARTFORD FINISHING, INC.
- Site address
- 844 W STATE STREET
- City
- HARTFORD
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53027
- Mailing
- 844 W STATE STREET, HARTFORD, WI 53027
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332812
- Employees
- 160
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.124 F
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,475 Reduced
1430
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.124(f): Employees were not knowledgeable of the proper first-aid procedures appropriate to the dipping or coating hazards to which they were exposed: (a) On or about April 4, 2014 employee(s) were not knowledgeable of the first aid procedures appropriate to the dipping or coating hazards that they were exposed to.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2475
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1430
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: (a) On or about April 4, 2014, employees were not provided personal protective equipment training for dipping or coating operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1430
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) On or about April 4, 2014, employees were not provided effective information or training on the hazardous chemicals they use within the stripping area
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.124 G02
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
1430
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.124(g)(2): Employees who worked with liquids that could burn, irritate, or otherwise harm their skin were not provided with an emergency shower and eye-wash station close to the dipping and coating operation: (a) On or about April 4, 2014, employees were exposed to serious chemical burn and irritation hazards. The eye wash station was located up to 90 feet away from the stripping area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,465 Reduced
1430
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: (a) On or about April 4, 2014, the employer did not ensure that temporary employees were using personal protective equipment while performing dipping and coating procedures. (b) On or about June 5, 2014 the employer had not provided adequate personal protective equipment for employees while performing dipping and coating procedures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3465
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Sep 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,980 Reduced
1430
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein: (a) On or about April 4, 2014, the employer did not assure that the parts dip tanks containing corrosive cleaning solutions were properly labeled tagged or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings in the stripping area. (b) On or about April 4, 2014, the employer did not assure that the parts dip half barrel containing corrosive cleaning solutions was properly labeled tagged or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings in the stripping area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1980
- — Z (S) $3600
More inspections at Hartford Finishing, INC.
View Hartford Finishing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332812)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339796500.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.