Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: JOSE MARTINEZ MENDOZA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE MARTINEZ MENDOZA in LOT 1 MILLWOOD SUBDIVISION, AUBURN, AL 36830 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339798480.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Martinez Mendoza — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Martinez Mendoza is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
LOT 1 MILLWOOD SUBDIVISION
City
AUBURN
State
AL
ZIP
36830
Mailing
2356 LANDING CT, NORCROSS, GA 30071
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a)  At Lot 1 Millwood Subdivision Auburn, Alabama:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to ensure employees operating pneumatic nail guns on site were using eye protection exposing them to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.304 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1926.304(d): Portable, power-driven circular saw(s) were not equipped with a guard above and below the base plate or shoe:  a)  At Lot 1 Millwood Subdivision Auburn, Alabama:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to ensure a Dewalt skill saw used on site had a properly working guard exposing employees struck-by hazards from the exposed blade.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Abate by
Jul 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide:  a) Rear of House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to provide employees a walk board measuring at least 18 inches wide to perform framing activities exposing them to a fall hazard of 12.3 feet to the ground below.  b) Left Side of House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to provide employees a walk board measuring at least 18 inches wide to perform framing activities exposing them to a fall hazard of 19.3 feet to the ground below.  c) Right Side of House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to provide employees a walk board measuring at least 18 inches wide to perform framing activities exposing them to a fall hazard of 13.3 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Abate by
Jul 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level:  a) Rear of House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to ensure employees working from a 2 x 8 inch walk board had fall protection exposing them to a fall hazard of 12.3 feet to the ground below.  a) Left Side of House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to ensure employees working from a 2 x 8 inch walk board had fall protection exposing them to a fall hazard of 19.3 feet to the ground below.  a) Right Side of House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to ensure employees working from a 2 x 8 inch walk board had fall protection exposing them to a fall hazard of 13.3 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Abate by
Jul 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) At Lot 1 Millwood Subdivision Auburn, Alabama:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to ensure employees involved in framing activities from the roof of a house had fall protection in place exposing them to a fall hazard of 15.5 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B14

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Abate by
Jul 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14): Each employee working on, at, above, or near wall openings (including those with chutes attached), where the outside bottom edge of the wall opening was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels and the inside bottom edge of the wall opening is less than 39 inches (1.0 M) above the walking/working surface, is not protected from falling by the use of a guardrail system, a safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system:  a)  Right Side of House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to ensure guardrails were in place at wall opening where employees performed work exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 16.7 feet to the ground below.  b)  Front of House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to ensure guardrails were in place at two wall openings where employees performed work exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 14 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Abate by
Jul 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a)  At Lot 1 Millwood Subdivision Auburn, Alabama:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to train his employees on fall hazards to include but not limited to setting up fall protection, the nature of fall hazards, and the use of personal fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 A01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Abate by
Jul 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1053(a)(1): Ladders shall be capable of supporting the following loads without failure:  a)  Inside House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to fall hazards in that he allowed his employees to use job made ladders on site to gain access to and from the second level of the house and to job made scaffolding located on the perimeter of the house which did not proper blocks installed and the ladders were too wide between the rails.  b)  RearSide of House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to fall hazards in that he allowed his employees to use job made ladders on site to gain access to and from the second level of the house and to job made scaffolding located on the perimeter of the house which did not proper blocks installed and the ladders were not wide enough between the rails.  c)  Right of House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to fall hazards in that he allowed his employees to use job made ladders on site to gain access to and from the second level of the house and to job made scaffolding located on the perimeter of the house which did not proper blocks installed and the ladders were either too wide between the rails.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2014
Abate by
Jul 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a) Right Side of House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to ensure a job made ladder used to gain access to and from a walk board had its rails extend at least three feet above the landing area exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 13.3 feet to the ground below.  b) Inside of House:  On or about June 2, 2014 and at times prior; the employer failed to ensure a job made ladder used to gain access to and from a walk board had its rails extend at least three feet above the landing area exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 11.5 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Jose Martinez Mendoza's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339798480.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.