Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NOLAN LOGISTICS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NOLAN LOGISTICS, INC. in 1250 W. LASKEY, TOLEDO, OH 43612 (NAICS 484110). OSHA activity number 339821803.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nolan Logistics, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nolan Logistics, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1250 W. LASKEY
City
TOLEDO
State
OH
ZIP
43612
Mailing
131 E. COURT AVE. #200, JEFFERSONVILLE, IN 47130
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
484110
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2014
Abate by
Sep 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a yard tractor.      a)      On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that employees successfully completed an operator training program containing elements in 29 CFR 1910.178(l) before employees were permitted to operate the yard tractors.    AVD amended to read:  &.the employer did not assure that employees completed a compliant operator training program, in that, the employers training program did not include the formal training requirement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2014
Abate by
Aug 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s)    a)      On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that the Ottawa yard truck 00 (Model 30, Serial# 74124) was removed from service during a time in which it was in need of repair.  Employees were exposed to injuries related to unsafe operating conditions in that the horn was not functioning.        b)      On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that the Ottawa yard truck 01 (VIN 328838) was removed from service during a time in which it was in need of repair.  Employees were exposed to injuries related to unsafe operating conditions in that the horn and back up alarm were not functioning.      c)      On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that the Ottawa yard truck 02 (VIN 328839) was removed from service during a time in which it was in need of repair.  The yard truck was not in a safe operating condition in that the windshield was cracked potentially obstructing the operators view.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2014
Abate by
Aug 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  a)      On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that the Ottawa yard truck 00 (Model 30, Serial# 74124) was examined for conditions that adversely affect the trucks safety before being placed into service.  The yard truck was not in a safe operating condition in that horn was not functioning.     b)      On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that the Ottawa yard truck 01 (VIN 328838) was examined for conditions that adversely affect the trucks safety before being placed into service.  The yard truck was not in a safe operating condition in that horn and back up alarm were not functioning and the windshield was cracked potentially obstructing the operators view.      c)      On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that the Ottawa yard truck 02 (VIN 328839) was examined for conditions that adversely affect the trucks safety before being placed into service.  The yard truck was not in a safe operating condition in that the windshield was cracked potentially obstructing the operators view.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Nolan Logistics, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339821803.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.