TOLEDO, OH —
OSHA Inspection: NOLAN LOGISTICS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NOLAN LOGISTICS, INC. in 1250 W. LASKEY, TOLEDO, OH 43612 (NAICS 484110). OSHA activity number 339821803.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NOLAN LOGISTICS, INC.
- Site address
- 1250 W. LASKEY
- City
- TOLEDO
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43612
- Mailing
- 131 E. COURT AVE. #200, JEFFERSONVILLE, IN 47130
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 484110
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a yard tractor. a) On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that employees successfully completed an operator training program containing elements in 29 CFR 1910.178(l) before employees were permitted to operate the yard tractors. AVD amended to read: &.the employer did not assure that employees completed a compliant operator training program, in that, the employers training program did not include the formal training requirement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s) a) On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that the Ottawa yard truck 00 (Model 30, Serial# 74124) was removed from service during a time in which it was in need of repair. Employees were exposed to injuries related to unsafe operating conditions in that the horn was not functioning. b) On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that the Ottawa yard truck 01 (VIN 328838) was removed from service during a time in which it was in need of repair. Employees were exposed to injuries related to unsafe operating conditions in that the horn and back up alarm were not functioning. c) On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that the Ottawa yard truck 02 (VIN 328839) was removed from service during a time in which it was in need of repair. The yard truck was not in a safe operating condition in that the windshield was cracked potentially obstructing the operators view.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: a) On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that the Ottawa yard truck 00 (Model 30, Serial# 74124) was examined for conditions that adversely affect the trucks safety before being placed into service. The yard truck was not in a safe operating condition in that horn was not functioning. b) On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that the Ottawa yard truck 01 (VIN 328838) was examined for conditions that adversely affect the trucks safety before being placed into service. The yard truck was not in a safe operating condition in that horn and back up alarm were not functioning and the windshield was cracked potentially obstructing the operators view. c) On or about June 24, 2014, the employer did not assure that the Ottawa yard truck 02 (VIN 328839) was examined for conditions that adversely affect the trucks safety before being placed into service. The yard truck was not in a safe operating condition in that the windshield was cracked potentially obstructing the operators view.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Nolan Logistics, INC.
View Nolan Logistics, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 484110)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339821803.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.