CUMMING, GA —
OSHA Inspection: PANDUIT CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PANDUIT CORPORATION in 1819 ATLANTA HIGHWAY, CUMMING, GA 30040 (NAICS 336320). OSHA activity number 339824849.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PANDUIT CORPORATION
- Site address
- 1819 ATLANTA HIGHWAY
- City
- CUMMING
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30040
- Mailing
- 18900 PANDUIT DR, TINLEY PARK, IL 60487
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336320
- Employees
- 173
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,825 · Current $2,295 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet (1.22 m) or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)), on all open sides: On or about 6/24/2014 in the storage and work area over the office and restrooms: Employee was exposed to a fall hazard at up to 8 feet 9 inches from the unguarded sections of the storage and work area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2295
- — Z (S) $3825
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,780 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: On or about 6/24/14 in the machine production areas at 1819 Atlanta Highway in Cumming, GA: employees perform services/maintenance such as setting up, take down, blade changes, clearing, and unjamming machines without the equipment such as but not limited to the ABM2S-Tape Machines and Engel-Machines being locked and/or tagged out.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3780
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,825 · Current $2,295 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: On or about 6/24/14 in the machine production areas at 1819 Atlanta Highway in Cumming, GA: the employer did not perform annual periodic inspection on the equipment that the employees were required to perform maintenance, repairs, services, adjustments, unjamming, setup, and cleaning. Equipment such as but not limited to: a. Extrusion line equipment - most recent review of the procedures was 2008 b. Engel Molding Line equipment - most recent review of the procedures was 2011 c. 11 Web Roll Converting and Application Line equipment - most recent review of the procedures was 2009 d. 18 Tape Application Line equipment - most recent review of the procedures was 2011
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2295
- — Z (S) $3825
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,295 · Current $1,377 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): On or about 6/24/14 in the shipping and receiving area; Where a powered industrial truck was missing bolt and had a loose bolt on the driver side of the metal mast support bracket the employer failed to inspect the powered industrial truck prior to use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1377
- — Z (S) $2295
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,825 · Current $2,295 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about 6/24/14 in the tool and die shop area: employees operating the lathes to manufacture and work on parts and material were not protected from the unguarded area of the rotating parts, where the employees would place their hands to work on the material or parts. a. Leblond lathe up to 1800 rpm b. Hardinge lathe up to 1800 rpm
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2295
- — Z (S) $3825
More inspections at Panduit Corporation
View Panduit Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336320)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339824849.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.