Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC. in 1115 WAYNE STREET, SAINT MARYS, OH 45885 (NAICS 424990). OSHA activity number 339831869.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Veyance Technologies INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Veyance Technologies INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1115 WAYNE STREET
City
SAINT MARYS
State
OH
ZIP
45885
Mailing
1115 WAYNE STREET, SAINT MARYS, OH 45885
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424990
Employees
415
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Dec 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2):  The floor of every workroom was not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition.         (a)  Veyance Technologies, Inc., 1115 Wayne Street, St. Marys, Ohio:  On or about July 01, 2014, the employer did not ensure that the floor near and under the dust collectors in the mixing department were free of accumulation of dust. Laboratory analysis of the dust indicated that it was explosive, exposing employees to hazards from fire and explosion.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.1000 A02

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Mar 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2):  An employee's exposure to any substance in Table Z-1 exceeded the 8-hour Time Weighed Average given for that substance in an 8-hour work shift of a 40-hour work week:           (a)  Veyance Technologies, Inc., 1115 Wayne Street, St. Marys, Ohio:  On or about July 31, 2014, the employer did not ensure that employees manually feeding rubber and chemicals to the Banbury mixers were not exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR) in excess of the permissible exposure limit.  An employee was exposed to PNOR at an 8-hour time weighted average of 24.5 mg/m3 which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit of 15.0 mg/m3 by 163%.         (b)  Veyance Technologies, Inc., 1115 Wayne Street, St. Marys, Ohio:  On or about July 31, 2014, the employer did not ensure that employees manually feeding rubber and chemicals to the Banbury mixers were not exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR) in excess of the permissible exposure limit.  An employee was exposed to PNOR at an 8-hour time weighted average of 15.1 mg/m3 which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit of 15.0 mg/m3 by 101%.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $5000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.1000 E

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Apr 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):       (a)  Veyance Technologies, Inc., 1115 Wayne Street, St. Marys, Ohio:  On or about July 31, 2014, the employer did not ensure that employees manually feeding rubber and chemicals to the Banbury mixers were not exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR) in excess of the permissible exposure limit.  An employee was exposed to PNOR at an 8-hour time weighted average of 24.5 mg/m3 which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit of 15.0 mg/m3 by 163%.       (b)  Veyance Technologies, Inc., 1115 Wayne Street, St. Marys, Ohio:  On or about July 31, 2014, the employer did not ensure that employees manually feeding rubber and chemicals to the Banbury mixers were not exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR) in excess of the permissible exposure limit.  An employee was exposed to PNOR at an 8-hour time weighted average of 15.1 mg/m3 which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit of 15.0 mg/m3 by 101%.    Step 1:  Effective respiratory protection shall be provided and used by exposed employees as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering and / or administrative controls can be implemented, or whenever such controls fail to reduce employee exposure to within permissible exposure limits.  When personal exposure concentrations exceed the maximum allowable concentration for the respirator used, the employer shall ensure employees are protected with a respirator appropriate for the exposure concentration.    Step 2:  Within 60 days submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and /or administrative measures to control employee exposure to hazardous substances as referenced in the citation.  This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation.                 1.  Evaluation of engineering / administrative controls options;              2.  Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design              3.  Procurement, installation, and operation of selected control measures; and              4.  Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls    Step 3:  Within 90 days abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and / or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance.  Feasible engineering controls include but are not limited to: 1. Improve the mechanical ventilation system to capture and remove dust for the workplace.   2. Modify work practices so that dust is not generated while handling the rubber and chemicals. 3. Ensure that the dust collection system on the mixer and associated equipment is leak-tight and does not release dust into the workplace.    Date by which step 1 must be abated: Date by which step 2 must be abated: Date by which step 3 must be abated:    Ultimate responsibility for determining the most appropriate method rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the specific conditions at the workplace.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Veyance Technologies INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339831869.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.