Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ARNULFO RODRIGUEZ ROOFING, CO., INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARNULFO RODRIGUEZ ROOFING, CO., INC. in 1934 PARNEVIK PL., CONROE, TX 77304 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339850182.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Arnulfo Rodriguez Roofing, CO., INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Arnulfo Rodriguez Roofing, CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1934 PARNEVIK PL.
City
CONROE
State
TX
ZIP
77304
Mailing
6811 THEALL RD. SUITE A, HOUSTON, TX 77066
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
21
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2014
Abate by
Aug 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,760 · Current $1,760
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support).  The employer does not use non-supporting ladders at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder is approximately one-quarter the working length of the ladder.  a. This violation was observed on or about July 14, 2014, on the NE corner of a single family dwelling where an employee was exposed to an 8 foot fall hazard when accessing a roof without a 28-foot extension ladder being used at an angle of 4 to 1.   b. This violation was observed on or about July 14, 2014, on the central west roof of a single family dwelling where an employee was exposed to an 8 foot fall hazard when accessing a roof without a 28-foot extension ladder being used at an angle of 4 to 1.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that non-self-supporting ladders are used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder is approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support).
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1760

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2014
Abate by
Aug 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $4,400
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).   The employer does not protect employees from falling when working 6 feet or more above lower levels. This violation was observed on or about July 14, 2014, on the roof of single family dwelling where employees were exposed to an 8 foot fall hazard when performing roofing activities on a residential structure without a fall protection system.   Arnulfo Rodriguez Roofing, Co., Inc. dba Rodriguez Roofing Company was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 960351, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on March 7, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 3003 Meadow Prairie St., Katy, TX 77494.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels are protected from falling.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (R) $4400

1904.40 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2014
Abate by
Aug 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $440 · Current $440
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours.  The employer does not provide an authorized government representative the records within 4 business hours. This violation occurred on or about July 15, 2014, when a request for OSHA Recordkeeping Logs was made and no response was received.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that authorized government representatives are provided with records within four business hours.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $440

View Arnulfo Rodriguez Roofing, CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339850182.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.