STEPHENVILLE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: SUPERIOR POWDER COATING, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SUPERIOR POWDER COATING, INC. in 645 W. LINGLEVILLE ROAD, STEPHENVILLE, TX 76401 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 339853608.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUPERIOR POWDER COATING, INC.
- Site address
- 645 W. LINGLEVILLE ROAD
- City
- STEPHENVILLE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76401
- Mailing
- 645 W. LINGLEVILLE ROAD, STEPHENVILLE, TX 76401
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332812
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures: This violation occurred on July 16, 2014 and at times prior thereto, in the spray area of the manufacturing facility, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees wearing respirators to perform spraying operations in the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: This violation occurred on July 16, 2014 and at times prior thereto, in the spray area of the manufacturing facility, the employer did not provide medical evaluation for employees required to use respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirators is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter: This violation occurred on July 16, 2014 and at times prior thereto, in the spray area of the manufacturing facility, where employees required to use respirators were not fit tested prior to respirator use and annually.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.141 A03 I
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(i): The employer did not maintain restrooms in a clean and sanitary condition: This violation occurred on July 16, 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees working in the manufacturing facility were not provided with clean and sanitized restrooms exposing them to harmful diseases.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: This violation occurred on July 16, 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees using corrosive chemicals in the spray area were not provided suitable facility for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body within the work area for immediate use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning was not reduced to less than 30psi: This violation occurred on July 16, 2014, and at times prior thereto, in the spray area, employees were using compressed air set above 120 psi to clean themselves exposing employees to embolism.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910. 1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each work place, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning: This violation occurred on July 16, 2014, and at times prior thereto, in the manufacturing facility, the employer did not ensure that a written hazard communication program with all the required elements was available at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $400
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections at Superior Powder Coating, INC.
View Superior Powder Coating, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332812)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339853608.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.