Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SIDE BY SIDE STORAGE, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SIDE BY SIDE STORAGE, LLC in 19 GROVE ST, GLOVERSVILLE, NY 12078 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 339856635.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Side by Side Storage, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Side by Side Storage, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
19 GROVE ST
City
GLOVERSVILLE
State
NY
ZIP
12078
Mailing
19 GROVE ST, GLOVERSVILLE, NY 12078
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii):  Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:     (a) On or about 07/18/2014, circuit breaker panel that powers the garage door, breaker covers for unused portions were missing exposing employees to live electrical current from bus bar.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1260
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.334 A05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(5)(ii): Energized plug and receptacle connections may be handled only with insulating protective equipment if the condition of the connection could provide a conducting path to the employee's hand (if, for example, a cord connector is wet from being immersed in water):    (a) On or about 07/18/2014, at facility, for the office assistant cleaning the subbasement with lead cords used for lighting submerged in water.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1260
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer failed to ensure that the exposure assessment was conducted in time to comply with requirements which are triggered by the exposure data or the lack of a negative exposure assessment:     (a) On or about 07/18/2014,  for the office assistant removing asbestos containing pipe insulation and dry sweeping ACM. The employer did not do an exposure assessment of the work area.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1260
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(1): The employer did not use the following engineering controls and work practices: vacuum cleaners equipped with HEPA filters to collect all debris and dust containing ACM and PACM, wet methods, or wetting agents, to control employee exposures during asbestos handling, mixing, removal, cutting, application, cleanup, and prompt clean-up and disposal of wastes and debris contaminated with asbestos in leak-tight containers, regardless of the levels of exposure:     (a) On or about 07/18/2014,  for the office assistant removing asbestos containing pipe insulation and dry sweeping ACM.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1260
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 G03 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(3)(iii): The following work practices and engineering controls such as, but not limited to, dry sweeping can not be used for work related to asbestos or for work which disturbs ACM or PACM, regardless of measured levels of asbestos exposure or the results of initial exposure assessments:    (a) On or about 07/18/2014,  for the office assistant removing asbestos containing pipe insulation and dry sweeping ACM.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1260
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In the workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or where respirators were required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures including the provisions (i)-(ix) of this section, as applicable:     (a) On or about 07/18/2014, at facility, for the office assistant wearing a Gerson half face respirator while removing asbestos containing insulation off pipes and dry sweeping ACM and while scraping paint containing lead.  The employer did not implement a worksite-specific respiratory protection program.         Abatement Note:         The Respiratory Protection Program shall include the following sections:     (1) Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace;   (2) Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators;       (3) Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators;   (4) Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency       situations;   (5) Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing,   discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators;       (6) Procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-   supplying respirators (if used);   (7) Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during       routine and emergency situations;       (8) Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing   them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance; and   (9) Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1260
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:       (a) On or about 07/18/2014, at facility, for the office assistant wearing a Gerson half face respirator while removing asbestos containing insulation off pipes and dry sweeping ACM and while scraping paint containing lead.  The employee was not provided a medical evaluation prior to being required to wear the respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  The employer did not ensure that employees using tight fitting face piece respirators pass an appropriate qualitative or quantitative fit test prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.     (a) On or about 07/18/2014, at facility, for the office assistant wearing a Gerson half face respirator while removing asbestos containing insulation off pipes and dry sweeping ACM and while scraping paint containing lead.  The employees were not provided a fit test prior to being required to wear the respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(1): For employees who use respirators required by 29 CFR 1926.1101, the employer did not provide each employee an appropriate respirator that complied with the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.1101(h):     (a) On or about 07/18/2014,  for the office assistant removing asbestos containing pipe insulation and dry sweeping ACM.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.62 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by this standard didn't initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level:        a) On or about 07/18/2014, at facility, for the office assistant exposed to lead paint while scraping and painting interior partitions in the building being renovated into storage space.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1260
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.62 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.62(e)(1): The employer did not implement engineering and work practice controls, including administrative controls, to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead to the extent that such controls reduce employee exposure to the lowest feasible level:     a) On or about 07/18/2014, at facility, for the office assistant exposed to lead paint while scraping and painting interior partitions in the building being renovated into storage space.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 K01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1)(i): Employer and building owner did not identify TSI and sprayed or troweled on surfacing materials in buildings as asbestos-containing and did not communicate information to employees pursuant to this standard, and identify "PACM" as ACM:     (a) On or about 07/18/2014,  for the office assistant removing asbestos containing pipe insulation and dry sweeping ACM.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1260
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 K08 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2014
Abate by
Jun 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(8)(vii): Labels or signs were not affixed or posted so that employees will be notified of what materials contain PACM and/or ACM:    (a) On or about 07/18/2014,  for the office assistant removing asbestos containing pipe insulation and dry sweeping ACM.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

View Side by Side Storage, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339856635.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.