Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SIDE BY SIDE STORAGE, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SIDE BY SIDE STORAGE, LLC in 19 GROVE ST, GLOVERSVILLE, NY 12078 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 343129011.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Side by Side Storage, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Side by Side Storage, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
19 GROVE ST
City
GLOVERSVILLE
State
NY
ZIP
12078
Mailing
19 GROVE ST, GLOVERSVILLE, NY 12078
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1001 J07 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,691 · Current $2,846 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(7)(iv): The employer did not provide, at no cost to employees who perform housekeeping operations in an area which contains presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) and/or other asbestos-containing material (ACM), an asbestos awareness training course:    a) On or about 4/01/2018 - 5/01/2018, throughout 19 Grove St building, employees performed various housekeeping, service, and maintenance tasks throughout the building and who were allowed to move freely throughout the building where asbestos was present.  The employer did not train the employees on the hazards of asbestos.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2845.5
  • — C (S) $5691
  • — Z (S) $5691

1910.1025 M01 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,691 · Current $2,845 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(1)(iii): The employer did not include lead in the hazard communication program established to comply with the HCS (� 1910.1200), and the employer did not ensure that each employee had access to labels on containers of lead and to safety data sheets, and that employees were trained on lead in accordance with the requirements of HCS and paragraph (l) of this section:    a) On or about 4/01/2018 - 5/01/2018, throughout 19 Grove St building, employees performed various housekeeping, service, and maintenance tasks throughout the building and who were allowed to move freely throughout the building where lead was present.  The employer did not train the employees on the hazards of lead.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2845
  • — C (S) $5691
  • — Z (S) $5691

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     a) On or about 4/01/2018 - 5/01/2018, throughout 19 Grove St building, employees performed various housekeeping, service, and maintenance tasks throughout the building and who were allowed to move freely throughout the building where asbestos and lead was present.  The employer did not implement a hazard communication program.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K01 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1)(ii): The employer did not include asbestos in the program established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) and ensure each employee was trained in accordance with the provisions of the HCS and paragraphs (k)(9) and (10) of this section. The employer did not provide information on at least the following hazards: Cancer and lung effects.    a) On or about 4/01/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos thermal system insulation (TSI) from existing pipes and then removed pipes with residual ACM from the ceiling with a sawzall too, allowing ACM to accumulate on the floor.  The employer did not train the employees on the hazards of asbestos.    b) On or about 4/01/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos containing floor tiles (VAT) with the forks of a forklift.  The employer did not train the employees on the hazards of asbestos.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 E01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,691 · Current $2,846 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(1): All Class I, II, and III asbestos work was not conducted within regulated areas:     a) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees performed Class I asbestos work by removing asbestos thermal system insulation (TSI) from existing pipes and then removed pipes with residual ACM from the ceiling with a sawzall too allowing ACM to accumulate on the floor.  The employer did not establish a regulated area to minimize exposure to asbestos.      b) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees performed Class II asbestos work by removing  asbestos containing floor tiles (VAT) with the forks of a forklift.  The employer did not establish a regulated area to minimize exposure to asbestos.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2845.5
  • — C (S) $5691
  • — Z (S) $5691

1926.1101 J02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,691 · Current $2,846 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(j)(2): The hygiene facilities and practices listed in sections (i) through (v) of this paragraph were not followed for employees performing Class I work involving less than 25 linear or 10 square feet of TSI or surfacing ACM and PACM, and for Class II and Class III asbestos work operations where exposures exceed a PEL or where there is no negative exposure assessment produced before the operation:    a) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos thermal system insulation (TSI) from existing pipes and then removed pipes with residual ACM from the ceiling with a sawzall too allowing ACM to accumulate on the floor.  The employer did not have hygiene facilities and work practices to reduce exposure to asbestos.      b) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos containing floor tiles (VAT) with the forks of a forklift.  The employer did not have hygiene facilities and work practices to reduce exposure to asbestos.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2845.5
  • — C (S) $5691
  • — Z (S) $5691

1926.1101 K02 II C

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Jan 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,691 · Current $2,846 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(2)(ii)(C): The building owner and/or facility owner did not notify all employers of employees who work within or adjacent to the areas containing asbestos containing materials (ACM) and presumed asbestos containing materials of the presence, location and quantity:     a) On or about 4/01/2018 - 5/01/2018, throughout 19 Grove St building, employer failed to provide information on the presence, location, and quantity of asbestos to subcontractors such as, but not limited to, electricians and window company.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2845.5
  • — C (S) $5691
  • — Z (S) $5691

1926.1101 K09 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,691 · Current $2,846 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(i): The employer did not institute, at no cost to employees, a training program for each employee who was likely to be exposed in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL) and for each employee who performed Class I through IV asbestos operations:    a) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos thermal system insulation (TSI) from existing pipes and then removed pipes with residual ACM from the ceiling with a sawzall too, allowing ACM to accumulate on the floor.  The employer did not train the employees on asbestos who were performing Class I asbestos work.    b) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos containing floor tiles (VAT) with the forks of a forklift.  The employer did not train the employees on asbestos who were performing Class II asbestos work.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2845.5
  • — C (S) $5691
  • — Z (S) $5691

1926.1101 F02 I

Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $11,382 · Current $5,691 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer with a work operation covered by the asbestos standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace:    a) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos thermal system insulation (TSI) from existing pipes and then removed pipes with residual ACM from the ceiling with a sawzall too, allowing ACM to accumulate on the floor.  The employer did not perform an exposure assessment to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of asbestos to minimize exposure to asbestos.    b) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos containing floor tiles (VAT) with the forks of a forklift.  The employer did not perform an exposure assessment to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of asbestos to minimize exposure to asbestos.      Side by Side Storage, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.1101(f)(2)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 985663, citation number 1, item number 6 and was affirmed as a final order on 03/05/2015, with respect to a workplace located at 19 Grove St. Gloversville, NY.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $5691
  • — C (R) $11382
  • — Z (R) $11382

1926.1101 G01

Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $11,382 · Current $5,691 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(1): The employer did not use the following engineering controls and work practices: vacuum cleaners equipped with HEPA filters to collect all debris and dust containing ACM and PACM, wet methods, or wetting agents, to control employee exposures during asbestos handling, mixing, removal, cutting, application, cleanup, and prompt clean-up and disposal of wastes and debris contaminated with asbestos in leak-tight containers, regardless of the levels of exposure:     a) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos thermal system insulation (TSI) from existing pipes and then removed pipes with residual ACM from the ceiling with a sawzall too, allowing ACM to accumulate on the floor.  The employer did not use engineering controls and work practices to minimize exposure to asbestos.     b) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos containing floor tiles (VAT) with the forks of a forklift.  The employer did not use engineering controls and work practices to minimize exposure to asbestos.      Side by Side Storage, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.1101(g)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 985663, citation number 1, item number 7 and was affirmed as a final order on 03/05/2015, with respect to a workplace located at 19 Grove St. Gloversville, NY.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $5691
  • — C (R) $11382
  • — Z (R) $11382

1926.1101 G03 III

Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $11,382 · Current $5,691 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(3)(iii): The following work practices and engineering controls such as, but not limited to, dry sweeping can not be used for work related to asbestos or for work which disturbs ACM or PACM, regardless of measured levels of asbestos exposure or the results of initial exposure assessments:    a) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos thermal system insulation (TSI) from existing pipes and then removed pipes with residual ACM from the ceiling with a sawzall too, allowing ACM to accumulate on the floor.  The employer allowed employees to dry sweep debris which does not minimize exposure to asbestos and it is not an allowed work practice.     b) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos containing floor tiles (VAT) with the forks of a forklift.  The employer allowed employees to dry sweep debris which does not minimize exposure to asbestos and it is not an allowed work practice.      Side by Side Storage, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.1101(g)(3)(iii), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 985663, citation number 1, item number 8 and was affirmed as a final order on 03/05/2015, with respect to a workplace located at 19 Grove St. Gloversville, NY.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $5691
  • — C (R) $11382
  • — Z (R) $11382

1926.1101 H01

Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $11,382 · Current $5,691 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(1): For employees who use respirators required by 29 CFR 1926.1101, the employer did not provide each employee an appropriate respirator that complied with the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.1101(h):    a) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees performed Class I asbestos work by removing asbestos thermal system insulation (TSI) from existing pipes and then removed pipes with residual ACM from the ceiling with a sawzall too, allowing ACM to accumulate on the floor.  The employer did not provide a respirator to minimize exposure to asbestos.      b) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees performed Class II asbestos work by removing  asbestos containing floor tiles (VAT) with the forks of a forklift.  The employer did not provide a respirator to minimize exposure to asbestos.      Side by Side Storage, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.1101(h)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 985663, citation number 1, item number 9 and was affirmed as a final order on 03/05/2015, with respect to a workplace located at 19 Grove St. Gloversville, NY.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $5691
  • — C (R) $11382
  • — Z (R) $11382

1926.1101 K03 I

Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $11,382 · Current $5,691 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(i): Before the employer permitted its own employees to perform work subject to this standard in areas containing asbestos-containing material (ACM) and presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM), the employer did not identify the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing material and/or presumed asbestos containing material therein pursuant to 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1):    a) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos thermal system insulation (TSI) from existing pipes and then removed pipes with residual ACM from the ceiling with a sawzall too, allowing ACM to accumulate on the floor.  The employer did not determine the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing material (ACM) to minimize exposure to asbestos.    b) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos containing floor tiles (VAT) with the forks of a forklift.  The employer did not determine the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing material (ACM) to minimize exposure to asbestos.      Side by Side Storage, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.1101(k)(1)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 985663, citation number 1, item number 10 and was affirmed as a final order on 03/05/2015, with respect to a workplace located at 19 Grove St. Gloversville, NY.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $5691
  • — C (R) $11382
  • — Z (R) $11382

1926.1101 K08 VII

Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Feb 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $11,382 · Current $5,691 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(8)(vii): Labels or signs were not affixed or posted so that employees will be notified of what materials contain PACM and/or ACM:    a) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos thermal system insulation (TSI) from existing pipes and then removed pipes with residual ACM from the ceiling with a sawzall too, allowing ACM to accumulate on the floor.  The employer did not notify employees of what materials contain PACM and/or ACM to minimize exposure to asbestos.      b) On or about 4/22/2018 - 5/01/2018, in the 500 Area, employees removed asbestos containing floor tiles (VAT) with the forks of a forklift.  The employer did not notify employees of what materials contain PACM and/or ACM to minimize exposure to asbestos.      Side by Side Storage, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.1101(k)(8)(vii), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 985663, citation number 1, item number 11 and was affirmed as a final order on 03/05/2015, with respect to a workplace located at 19 Grove St. Gloversville, NY.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $5691
  • — C (R) $11382
  • — Z (R) $11382

View Side by Side Storage, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343129011.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.