Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: U.S. CHUTES CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of U.S. CHUTES CORPORATION in 607 BANTAM ROAD, BANTAM, CT 06750 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 339860371.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U.S. Chutes Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U.S. Chutes Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
607 BANTAM ROAD
City
BANTAM
State
CT
ZIP
06750
Mailing
715 PARK OF COMMERCE DRIVE, BOCA RATON, FL 33487
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
27
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2015
Abate by
Aug 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $770 · Current $770
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On, or about, June 30, 2015, the employer had not certified to OSHA, within 10 calendar days, that abatement had been completed on the following Serious citations issued to the company:  A.  Serious Citation 1, issued on November 24, 2014. B.  Serious Citation 5, issued on January 6, 2015.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $770

1910.110 B06 VI

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Feb 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.110(b)(6)(vi): Readily ignitable material such as weeds and long dry grass was not removed within 10 feet of any container:     Outside of Building, Near Front Entrance:  On, or about, July 22, 2014, a blackberry bush had grown up through the cylinder storage cage used to store propane and acetylene cylinders.    Also, a patch of pachysandra was located on the ground next to the cage.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $3080
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $3080

1910.253 B03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Feb 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(3)(ii): Acetylene cylinders in storage were not stored valve end up:   Outside of Building, Near Front Entrance:  On, or about, July 22, 2014, an acetylene cylinder was stored on its side inside of the compressed gas storage cage.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $0
  • — F (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.217 B03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Feb 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(3)(i): Mechanical power press(es) using full revolution clutches did not incorporate a single-stroke mechanism:    Fabrication Area:  On, or about, July 22, 2014, the Loshbough Jordon full revolution mechanical power press was not provided with a single stroke mechanism.
Recent events (4)
  • — C (S) $3080
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — Z $48000

1910.217 B04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Feb 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(4)(i): Pedal mechanism(s) on mechanical power press(es) full revolution clutches were not protected to prevent unintended operation from falling or moving objects or by accidental stepping onto the pedals:     Fabrication Area:  On, or about, July 22, 2014, a guard was not provided over the foot pedal on the Loshbough Jordan full revolution mechanical power press.
Recent events (4)
  • — C (S) $3080
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — Z $48000

1910.217 B04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Feb 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(4)(iii): Pedal return spring(s) of pedal(s) used on mechanical power press(es) using full revolution clutches were not of the compression type, operating on a rod or guided within a hole or tube, or designed to prevent interleaving of spring coils in the event of breakage:  Fabrication Area:  On, or about, July 22, 2014, the foot pedal return spring provided on the Loshbough Jordan full revolution mechanical power press could wind down into itself in the event that it broke.
Recent events (4)
  • — C (S) $0
  • — F (S) $0
  • — Z $0

1910.217 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Feb 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(e)(1)(i): A program of periodic and regular inspections of mechanical power press(es) was not established and followed to ensure that all parts, auxiliary equipment and safeguards were in a safe operating condition and adjustment:     Fabrication Area:  On, or about, July 22, 2014, the Loshbough Jordan full revolution mechanical power press was not subject to periodic, documented inspections.
Recent events (4)
  • — C (S) $3080
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — Z $48000

1910.255 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Feb 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.255(b)(4): All press welding machine operations, where there was a possibility of the operator's fingers being under the point of operation, were not effectively guarded by use of a device such as an electronic eye safety circuit, two hand controls or protection similar to that prescribed for punch press operations contained in 29 CFR 1910.217:     Fabrication Shop:  On, or about, July 22, 2014, point of operation safeguarding had not been provided on the LORS spot welder used to weld door connections onto sheet metal parts.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $3080
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $3080

1910.212 A03 II

Repeat Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2014
Abate by
Jan 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $10,780 · Current $4,758 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):   Fabrication Area:      a)  On, or about, July 22, 2014, point of operation safeguarding had not been provided on the Chicago, Dreis and Krump press brake.    b)  On, or about, July 22, 2014, the following stations on the GEKA Iron Worker were not adequately guarded:      1.      Punching station.  2.      Shear discharge area.  3.      Angle discharge area.    c)  On, or about, July 22, 2014, three spaces were left in the barrier guard provided on the Wysong shear that allowed entry to the hold-downs and shear blade.    U.S. Chutes Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 311763908, Citation Number 1, Item Number 9 and was affirmed as a final order on November 30, 2009, with respect to a workplace located at 607 Bantam Road, Bantam, Connecticut.
Recent events (4)
  • — C (R) $10780
  • — F (R) $4757.8
  • — Z $28000

View U.S. Chutes Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339860371.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.