Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: E-BOX, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of E-BOX, INC. in 101 AIRPARK INDUSTRIAL ROAD, ALABASTER, AL 35007 (NAICS 335999). OSHA activity number 339867541.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch E-Box, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for E-Box, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
E-BOX, INC.
Site address
101 AIRPARK INDUSTRIAL ROAD
City
ALABASTER
State
AL
ZIP
35007
Mailing
101 AIRPARK INDUSTRIAL ROAD, ALABASTER, AL 35007
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
335999
Employees
45
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,339 · Current $803 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): Exit access(es) were not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points:  (a) On or about 7/22/14 - in the Warehouse, the exit access between the rack identified as 10-12RT located near the restroom and the rack across from the electrical disconnects located on the wall adjacent to the paint booth area was about 14-inches wide.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $803.4
  • · Z (S) $1339

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  (a) On or about 7/22/14 - at the Gas Oven for Paint Drying, a procedure was not developed for controlling potentially hazardous energy when employees and contractors are servicing and/or maintaining the oven.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2940
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.147 C06 I C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,625 · Current $1,575 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i)(C): Where lockout was used for energy control, the periodic inspection did not include a review, between the inspector and each authorized employee, of that employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected:  (a) On or about 7/22/14 - at 101 Airpark Industrial Blvd, Alabaster, AL, a periodic inspection of energy control procedures  did not include a review between the inspector and each authorized employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1575
  • · Z (S) $2625

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 32 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,625 · Current $1,575 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:  (a) On or about 7/22/14 - at 101 Airpark Blvd., Alabaster, AL, the employer did not provide the required training for the control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) for authorized, affected, and other employees.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1575
  • · Z (S) $2625

1910.147 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(2)(i): When outside servicing personnel were engaged in activities in a facility, the onsite employer and the outside employer did not inform each other of their respective lockout or tagout procedures:  (a) On or about 7/22/14 - at 101 Airpark Blvd., Alabaster, AL, the employer did not inform outside servicing personnel of their lockout or tagout procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View E-Box, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339867541.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.