Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: OBED MEJIA-ESPINOZA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of OBED MEJIA-ESPINOZA in 106 QUAIL MEADOW DR., CONROE, TX 77384 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339869190.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Obed Mejia-Espinoza — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Obed Mejia-Espinoza is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
OBED MEJIA-ESPINOZA
Site address
106 QUAIL MEADOW DR.
City
CONROE
State
TX
ZIP
77384
Mailing
734 BANTON ST., CHANNELVIEW, TX 77530
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  The employer does not ensure that each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.  This violation was observed on or about July 25, 2014 when employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet while performing decking work without a fall protection system.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels are protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.   The employer does not ensure that the side rails on portable ladders used for access to an upper landing surface were extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed.  This violation was observed on or about July 25, 2014, at a residential home construction site where an employee was exposed to a fall hazard when accessing the roof with ladders whose rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that the side rails on portable ladders are extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 2014
Abate by
Aug 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired.  The employer does not ensure that portable ladders with broken or missing rungs were withdrawn from service.  This violation was observed on or about July 25, 2014 when employees were exposed to a fall hazard when accessing the roof of a residential home being constructed using a ladder which had rungs that were damaged.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure portable ladders with broken or missing rungs were withdrawn from service.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

View Obed Mejia-Espinoza's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339869190.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.