COLUMBUS, OH —
OSHA Inspection: JET CONTAINER COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JET CONTAINER COMPANY in 2050 S. HIGH STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43207 (NAICS 322213). OSHA activity number 339869893.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JET CONTAINER COMPANY
- Site address
- 2050 S. HIGH STREET
- City
- COLUMBUS
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43207
- Mailing
- 2050 S. HIGH STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43207
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 322213
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $630 · Current $630
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: a. The employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, December 31, 2014, for a violation of 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii), issued as citation 1, item 2, and described as follows: At the workplace, the point of operation of a slitter, machine 110, was not adequately guarded, exposing employees to an amputation hazard. At the workplace, the point of operation of the laminator / buildup machine was not adequately guarded, exposing employees to an amputation hazard. b. The employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, January 30, 2015, for a violation of 29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(i), issued as citation 1, item 3, and described as follows: a. At the workplace, the laminator / buildup machine, had a gear that was not adequately guarded, thereby exposed employees to a caught-in hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $630
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,733 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc. a. At the workplace, the S & S Flexographic machine 146, on the operator side, near the printer stations, had rotating rollers that were not guarded, thereby exposing employees to an ingoing nip point hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1732.5
- — Z (S) $3150
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,733 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle. a. At the workplace, the point of operation of a slitter, machine 110, was not adequately guarded, exposing employees to an amputation hazard. b. At the workplace, the point of operation of the laminator / buildup machine was not adequately guarded, exposing employees to an amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1732.5
- — Z (S) $3150
1910.219 F01 I
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,733 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(i): Gears. Gears shall be guarded in accordance with one of the following methods: By a complete enclosure; a. At the workplace, the laminator / buildup machine, had a gear that was not adequately guarded, thereby exposed employees to a caught-in hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1732.5
- — Z (S) $3150
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,400 · Current $770 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): What do I need to do to complete the OSHA 300 Log? You must enter information about your business at the top of the OSHA 300 Log, enter a one or two line description for each recordable injury or illness, and summarize this information on the OSHA 300-A at the end of the year. Located at Jet Container Company in Columbus, Ohio: a. On the 2014 OSHA 300 Log the employer did not provide all information required in Column F such as the object that directly caused the injury. The Jet Container Company was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313157000, citation number 1, item numbers 1a through 1d and was affirmed as a final order on June 25, 2010 with respect to a workplace located at 2050 South High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43207 .
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $770
- — Z (R) $1400
More inspections at JET Container Company
View JET Container Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 322213)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339869893.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.