Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JET CONTAINER COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JET CONTAINER COMPANY in 2050 S. HIGH STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43207 (NAICS 322213). OSHA activity number 339869893.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JET Container Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JET Container Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2050 S. HIGH STREET
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43207
Mailing
2050 S. HIGH STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43207
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322213
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2015
Abate by
Apr 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $630 · Current $630
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  a.  The employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, December 31, 2014, for a violation of 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii), issued as citation 1, item 2, and described as follows:  At the workplace, the point of operation of a slitter, machine 110, was not adequately guarded, exposing employees to an amputation hazard.  At the workplace, the point of operation of the laminator / buildup machine was not adequately guarded, exposing employees to an amputation hazard.  b.  The employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, January 30, 2015, for a violation of 29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(i), issued as citation 1, item 3, and described as follows:    a.  At the workplace, the laminator / buildup machine, had a gear that was not adequately guarded, thereby exposed employees to a caught-in hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $630

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2014
Abate by
Nov 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,150 · Current $1,733 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.    a.  At the workplace, the S & S Flexographic machine 146, on the operator side, near the printer stations, had rotating rollers that were not guarded, thereby exposing employees to an ingoing nip point hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1732.5
  • — Z (S) $3150

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2014
Abate by
Jan 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,150 · Current $1,733 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.    a.  At the workplace, the point of operation of a slitter, machine 110, was not adequately guarded, exposing employees to an amputation hazard.    b.  At the workplace, the point of operation of the laminator / buildup machine was not adequately guarded, exposing employees to an amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1732.5
  • — Z (S) $3150

1910.219 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2014
Abate by
Jan 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,150 · Current $1,733 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(i): Gears. Gears shall be guarded in accordance with one of the following methods:  By a complete enclosure;     a.  At the workplace, the laminator / buildup machine, had a gear that was not adequately guarded, thereby exposed employees to a caught-in hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1732.5
  • — Z (S) $3150

1904.29 B01

Repeat 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2014
Abate by
Oct 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,400 · Current $770 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): What do I need to do to complete the OSHA 300 Log? You must enter information about your business at the top of the OSHA 300 Log, enter a one or two line description for each recordable injury or illness, and summarize this information on the OSHA 300-A at the end of the year.  Located at Jet Container Company in Columbus, Ohio:  a. On the 2014 OSHA 300 Log the employer did not provide all information required in Column F such as the object that directly caused the injury.  The Jet Container Company was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313157000, citation number 1, item numbers 1a through 1d and was affirmed as a final order on June 25, 2010 with respect to a workplace located at 2050 South High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43207 .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $770
  • — Z (R) $1400

View JET Container Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339869893.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.