SAINT CHARLES, MO —
OSHA Inspection: SOLOMON CONTRACTING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SOLOMON CONTRACTING, INC. in 708 S. MAIN ST., SAINT CHARLES, MO 63301 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339893349.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SOLOMON CONTRACTING, INC.
- Site address
- 708 S. MAIN ST.
- City
- SAINT CHARLES
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63301
- Mailing
- 10858 GALT INDUSTRIAL BLVD., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63132
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): a. During construction work at 708 S. Main St., St. Charles, MO, on August 8, 2014, where fall protection was not required by the employer during roofing work on the 7:12 and 5:12 roof slopes and approximately 10 ft. 2 in. and 10 ft. 7 in. ground to eave heights, and where the foreman was working on the roof also without fall protection, an inspection was not made by a representative of the employer who was aware of the fall protection requirements, and who prohibited employees from working in an unsafe condition. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii): a. During construction work at 708 S. Main St., St. Charles, MO, on August 8, 2014, where fall protection was not required by the employer during roofing work on the 7:12 and 5:12 roof slopes and approximately 10 ft. 2 in. and 10 ft. 7 in. ground to eave heights, and where the foreman was working on the roof also without fall protection, site specific fall protection training was not provided to ensure work complied with the fall protection requirements. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer: a. During construction work at 708 S. Main St., St. Charles, MO, on August 8, 2014, where fall protection was not required by the employer during roofing work on the 7:12 and 5:12 roof slopes and approximately 10 ft. 2 in. and 10 ft. 7 in. ground to eave heights, and where the foreman was working on the roof also without fall protection, fall protection training documentation for the workers exposed was not available when requested on 8-8-14, and was not provided as of 8-21-14. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. During construction work at 708 S. Main St., St. Charles, MO, on August 8, 2014, safety glasses were not used during the use of pneumatic nailing guns. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $840
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. During construction work at 708 S. Main St., St. Charles, MO, on August 8, 2014, fall protection was not required during roofing work on the 7:12 and 5:12 roof slopes and approximately 10 ft. 2 in. and 10 ft. 7 in. ground to eave heights. The foreman was working on the roof with the other men supervised.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. During construction work at 708 S. Main St., St. Charles, MO, on August 8, 2014, fall protection was not required during roofing work on the 7:12 and 5:12 roof slopes and approximately 10 ft. 2 in. and 10 ft. 7 in. ground to eave heights. The foreman was working on the roof with the other men supervised.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Solomon Contracting, INC.
View Solomon Contracting, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339893349.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.