WILLIS, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: AMERITEX MACHINE AND FAB LLC
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of AMERITEX MACHINE AND FAB LLC in 13391 E FM 1097 ROAD, WILLIS, TX 77378 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 339910804.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMERITEX MACHINE AND FAB LLC
- Site address
- 13391 E FM 1097 ROAD
- City
- WILLIS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77378
- Mailing
- 13391 E FM 1097 ROAD, WILLIS, TX 77378
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332322
- Employees
- 70
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Oct 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program whenever employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels or an equivalent does of fifty percent. (a) This violation was observed on or about August 19, 2014 in the fabrication shop where an employee operating a needle gun was exposed to continuous noise at 86.1% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 88.9 dbA during the 412 minute sampling period on 08/19/14; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 68 minutes not sampled. (b) This violation was observed on or about August 19, 2014 in the fabrication shop where an employee operating as a helper was exposed to continuous noise at 67.9% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dbA) or equivalent sound level of approximately 87.2 dbA during the 311 minute sampling period on 8/19/2014; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 169 minutes not sampled. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees exposed to noise levels of 85 decibels or greater measured as a 8-hour time-weighted average are included in a continuing and effective hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.107 B05 I
- Issued
- Oct 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): The employer did not have visible gauges, audible alarms, or pressure activated devices installed to indicate or ensure that the required air velocity was maintained on a spray booth. The employer does not ensure that visible gauges, audible alarms, or pressure activated devices were installed to indicate or ensure that the required air velocity was maintained in the spray booth. This violation was observed on or about August 19, 2014, in the powder coating area spray booth, where employees were exposed to inhalation hazards in that visible gauges, audible alarms, or pressure activated devices were not installed to ensure that the required air velocity was maintained. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten(10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that visible gauges, audible alarms, or pressure activated devices are installed to indicate or ensure that the required air velocity is maintained in the spray booths.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Oct 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: The employer does not ensure that a written respirator protection program is established and implemented for required respirator use. This violation occurred on or about August 19, 2014 where painters were required to wear a 3M half-face respirators and a Clemco sandblasting hood when painting and sandblasting without the employer developing a respirator program. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that a written respirator protection program is established and implemented for required respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.134 I07
- Issued
- Oct 27, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(7): Oil lubricated compressor(s) used to supply breathing air did not have a high-temperature or carbon monoxide alarm(s) or both: The employer does not ensure that an oil lubricated compressors used to supply breathing air have a high temperature alarm or carbon monoxide alarm. This violation occurred on or about August 19, 2014 where employees were exposed to inhalation hazards when using a Clemco sandblasting hood with supplied air without a high temperature alarm or a carbon monoxide alarm. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that oil lubricated compressors used to supply breathing air have a high temperature alarm or carbon monoxide alarm.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Oct 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. The employer does not ensure that compressed air used for cleaning purposes is reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. a. This violation occurred on or about August 20, 2014, in the material prep area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when using compressed air greater than 30 p.s.i. to blow excess granite particles off parts that were recently painted. b. This violation occurred on or about August 20, 2014, in the powder coating booth where a painter was exposed to struck-by hazards when using compressed air greater than 30 p.s.i. to blow excess granite particles off his clothing after performing powder coating operations. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that compressed air used for cleaning purposes is reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1260
- · Z (S) $2100
More inspections at Ameritex Machine and FAB LLC
View Ameritex Machine and FAB LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332322)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339910804.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.