Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: ANOMATIC CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ANOMATIC CORPORATION in 1650 TAMARACK RD, NEWARK, OH 43055 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 339922742.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Anomatic Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Anomatic Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1650 TAMARACK RD
City
NEWARK
State
OH
ZIP
43055
Mailing
1650 TAMARACK RD, NEWARK, OH 43055
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
680
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2015
Abate by
Feb 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,550 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures shall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section.       a. In the production area, procedures for locking out the eyelet presses were not developed or utilized for employees performing maintenance and repairs of the presses.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4550
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2015
Abate by
Jan 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,550 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.    a. In the maintenance area, the Le Blond lathe was not adequately guarded. A chip guard was in place but did not prevent employees from coming into contact with rotating parts at the point of operation.     b. In the maintenance area, the Harrison M 600 lathe did not have guards attached to prevent employees from being caught in the point of operation.      c. In the maintenance area, the Bridgeport Mill model D675 serial number 7331, did not have guards attached to prevent employees from being caught in the point of operation.     d. In the maintenance area, the Bridgeport Mill J205129 did not have guards attached to prevent employees from being caught in the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4550
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2015
Abate by
Jan 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,658 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Installation and use. Listed or labeled equipment shall be installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling.    a. In the machine shop area, two receptacle boxes were not mounted to the wall in accordance to their listing and labeling. The two receptacles were hanging from flexible cords in the middle of the room.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1657.5
  • · Z (S) $2550

1910.212 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2015
Abate by
Feb 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $25,000 · Current $16,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.      a. In the production area, the eyelet presses were not adequately guarded. There were large holes in the enclosures around the eyelet presses that allowed access to moving parts in the press while it was in operation.    b. In the production area employees performed work on eyelet presses with the back door open while presses were in operation, exposing employees to moving parts.  The employer did not take adequate steps to prohibit bypassing doors and gates while the presses were in operation.      The Anomatic Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.212 (a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 794502, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on January 21, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 1650 Tamarack Rd., Newark, Ohio 43055.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (R) $16250
  • · Z (R) $25000

View Anomatic Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339922742.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.