BERLIN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: BUDNEY OVERHAUL & REPAIR, LTD.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BUDNEY OVERHAUL & REPAIR, LTD. in 131 NEW PARK DRIVE, BERLIN, CT 06037 (NAICS 336412). OSHA activity number 339927659.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BUDNEY OVERHAUL & REPAIR, LTD.
- Site address
- 131 NEW PARK DRIVE
- City
- BERLIN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06037
- Mailing
- 131 NEW PARK DRIVE, BERLIN, CT 06037
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336412
- Employees
- 160
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,825 · Current $1,913 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards posed by combustible metal dust: Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) De-burring Area: On, or about, August 29, 2014, the following hazards were observed: A dust collection system that consisted of plastic hose, ductwork and a Tempest cyclone dry-type dust collector (Model DC15MBOHP) served three workstations where employees de-burred and finished parts made of titanium, Inconel alloy and/or stainless steel. Employees at the workstations used hand tools such as Dremels to remove excess metal from the parts. The process generated combustible metal dust. The nature of the process e.g. applying friction to metal parts, in particular hard metals such as Iconel alloy and stainless steel created the potential for a spark or hot ember to enter the dust collection system. The dust collector had not been designed, installed, or maintained to protect employees against fire and explosion hazards from combustible metal dusts. Among other things, the collector was not arranged to minimize potential ignition sources. The ducts of the collector were not constructed of conductive material, or with smooth interior surfaces, to reduce the likelihood of static discharge. The collector pulled dust laden air through the fan assembly, causing contact between dust particles and fast moving parts. Further, the system was not operated in such a way to reduce accumulations of combustible dust inside and outside the collector. The collector lacked sufficient capture velocity to capture the combustible dust generated at the workstations, and the combustible dust that was collected in the system was not removed daily. Finally, the collector system was not arranged to prevent or mitigate employee exposure to potential fire/explosion hazards. The system was not equipped with explosion protection, explosion isolation or a fixed fire suppression system. The collector was located inside the building and recycled exhaust air inside the building into the area above the workstations. The collector was not equipped with a data plate and/or visible warning label to inform employees of combustible dust hazards associated with the collector.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1912.5
- — Z (S) $3825
1910.107 B09
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,295 · Current $1,148 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction: Paint Room: On, or about, August 29, 2014, a storage cabinet, cart and waste drum were all stored within three feet of the side of booth 3.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1147.5
- — Z (S) $2295
1910.107 E01
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,060 · Current $1,530 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(1): The storage of flammable liquids or liquids with a flashpoint greater than 199.4 °F (93 °C) in connection with spraying operations did not conform to the requirements of 1910.106: Paint Room: On, or about, August 29, 2014, brushes were left to soak in uncovered containers that contained Rockhard Thinner, a Category 3 flammable liquid with a flashpoint of 77.9 degrees. Ref. 29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(a)
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1530
- — Z (S) $3060
1910.107 J01
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(j)(1): Drying, curing, or fusion apparatus in connection with spray application of flammable and combustible finishes did not conform to the Standard for Ovens and Furnaces, NFPA 86A-1969, which is incorporated by reference as specified in 29 CFR 1910.6: Paint Room: On, or about, August 29, 2014, parts that had been painted/coated with Amtex RC-21, a Category 2 flammable liquid, were cured in Oven 77, a Grieve industrial oven, Model TA-500, serial number 641062. The oven was not designed for use with flammable solvents and a yellow placard was affixed to the exterior of the oven that stated that it was not for use with flammable solvents.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3150
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,295 · Current $1,148 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: OEM Manufacturing: On, or about, September 5, 2014, the employer required employees working at deburring stations to wear N95 respirators without having provided a medical evaluation prior to use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1147.5
- — Z (S) $2295
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: OEM Deburring: On, or about, September 5, 2014, the employer did not provide training to employees required to use N95 respirators while deburring parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,825 · Current $1,913 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: Overhaul Area: On, or about, August 29, 2014, regular duty wet/dry vacuum cleaners were provided for employees to clean work areas where combustible magnesium dust was generated.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1912.5
- — Z (S) $3825
More inspections at Budney Overhaul & Repair, LTD.
View Budney Overhaul & Repair, LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336412)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339927659.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.