Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BUDNEY OVERHAUL & REPAIR, LTD.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BUDNEY OVERHAUL & REPAIR, LTD. in 131 NEW PARK DRIVE, BERLIN, CT 06037 (NAICS 336412). OSHA activity number 348500406.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Budney Overhaul & Repair, LTD. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Budney Overhaul & Repair, LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
131 NEW PARK DRIVE
City
BERLIN
State
CT
ZIP
06037
Mailing
131 NEW PARK DRIVE, BERLIN, CT 06037
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336412
Employees
170
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2026
Penalty
Initial $7,235 · Current $7,500
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(1)(i): When the employer had assessed the workplace hazard(s) and determined that hazard(s) were present, the employer did not select and/or use the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee from the hazards that had been identified.  a) Fluorescent Penetrating Inspection Line (FPI) - Spray Booth and Wash Station:   On or about September 11, 2025, the employer did not select or provide appropriate personal protective equipment, such as goggles and face shields, necessary to adequately protect employees from splash hazards during spraying and rinsing operations in the Spray Booth and at the Wash Station. Employees working along the penetrant line were exposed to splash risks from corrosive chemicals including Method A: Water-Washable emulsifier penetrants containing a mixture of ethoxylated alcohols (ZL-67 and ZL-37) classified as a Category 1 eye-damaging agent, as well as other chemicals.   b) Fluorescent Penetrating Inspection Line (FPI) - UV Light Booth:   On or about September 11, 2025, the employer did not select or utilize personal protective equipment designed to safeguard employees from ultraviolet A (UV-A) rays generated by high-intensity ultraviolet radiation within the wavelength range of 320-400 nanometers. During fluorescent liquid penetrant inspection operations, employees were exposed without the benefit of UV-blocking eyewear and polycarbonate face shields necessary to shield the eyes and face from potentially hazardous UV-A rays emitted by both overhead LED UV-A lighting and hand-held UV-A lights in the inspection area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $7500
  • — Z (S) $7235

1910.133 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.133(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  Fluorescent Penetrating Inspection Line (FPI):   a)	On or about September 11, 2025, employees working along the penetrant line were exposed to splash hazards from corrosive liquids including ethoxylated alcohols (ZL-67, Category 1 eye damaging agent) and acetone (Acetone, Category 2 eye irritating agent), among others. The employer did not ensure that inspectors were provided the appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from liquid chemicals in the following locations:  	1. Spray-on Penetrant Booth 	2. Dipping Penetrant Booth   b)	On or about September 11, 2025, employees working along the penetrant line were exposed to ultraviolet radiation within the 320 to 400 nanometer spectral range without adequate protective equipment. The employer did not implement adequate protective measures to safeguard employees' skin or eyes while working in the following hazardous location along the FPI line:  	1. UV-light Booth
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2026
Penalty
Initial $7,235 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(8):  The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  FPI Building:  On or about September 11, 2025, the employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible to employees during their work shift when they were in their work areas operating fluorescent penetrant stations where injurious corrosive substances and irritants of the skin and eye were used, among other health categories. Employees working along the penetrant line were exposed to splash hazards from corrosive liquids including ethoxylated alcohols (ZL-67, Category 1 eye damaging agent) and acetone (Acetone, Category 2 eye irritating agent), among others.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7235

View Budney Overhaul & Repair, LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348500406.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.