PORTAGE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: PENDA CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PENDA CORPORATION in 2344 WEST WISCONSIN STREET, PORTAGE, WI 53901 (NAICS 423120). OSHA activity number 339934481.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PENDA CORPORATION
- Site address
- 2344 WEST WISCONSIN STREET
- City
- PORTAGE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53901
- Mailing
- 2344 W. WISCONSIN STREET, PORTAGE, WI 53901
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423120
- Employees
- 350
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.120 Q01
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): The employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations: On or about August 25, 2014, the employer did not develop an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations in conjunction with the response to a 100 gallon release of UTC - A Component, which contains up to 100% 4,4'-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.120 Q06 III
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii): Employees who participated as hazardous materials technicians, or were expected to participate as hazardous materials technicians, had not received at least 24 hours of training equal to the first responder operations level, and in addition have competency in the areas outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(A) through (q)(6)(iii)(I) and/or the employer did not so certify:Note: This SAVEs may be grouped with 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6) as appropriate. On or about August 25, 2014, the employer did not ensure that employees who participated as hazardous materials technicians had received at least 24 hours of training equal to the first responder operations level, and in addition have competency in the areas outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(A) through (q)(6)(iii)(I) during emergency response operations to a 100 gallon release of UTC - A Component, which contains up to 100% 4,4'-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.120 Q03 III
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iii): Based on the hazardous substances and/or conditions present, the individual in charge of the ICS did not implement appropriate emergency operations and did not ensure that the personal protective equipment worn was appropriate for the hazards encountered: On or about August 25, 2014, the employer did not implement appropriate emergency operations and did not ensure that the personal protective equipment worn was appropriate during emergency response operations to a 100 gallon release of UTC - A Component, which contains up to 100% 4,4'-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.120 Q03 IV
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iv): Employees engaged in emergency response and exposed to hazardous substances presenting an inhalation hazard or potential inhalation hazard, did not wear positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus until such time that the individual in charge of the incident command system determined through the use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection would not result in hazardous exposures to employees: On or about August 25, 2014, the employer did not ensure that employees exposed to hazardous substances presenting an inhalation hazard wear positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus until such time that the individual in charge determined through the use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection would not result in hazardous exposures to employees during emergency response operations to a 100 gallon release of UTC - A Component, which contains up to 100% 4,4'-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): On or about September 4, 2014, the employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment for employees working in the Bunk Assembly area with chemicals in their area, including but not limited to, UTC - A Component, which contains up to 100% 4,4'-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes. On or about September 4, 2014, the employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances for employees working in the Bunk Assembly area with chemicals in their area, including but not limited to, UTC - A Component, which contains up to 100% 4,4'-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.1200 H03 II
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
P125
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area: On or about September 4, 2014, the employer did not provide employees working in the Bunk Assembly area training on the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in their area, including but not limited to, UTC - A Component, which contains up to 100% 4,4'-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $7000
More inspections at Penda Corporation
View Penda Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423120)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339934481.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.