Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: M H & S CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of M H & S CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 8507 SILVERSTONE COURT, FORT SMITH, AR 72916 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339945891.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M H & S Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M H & S Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8507 SILVERSTONE COURT
City
FORT SMITH
State
AR
ZIP
72916
Mailing
1234 OLD HIGHWAY 71, FORT SMITH, AR 72916
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 7, 2014
Abate by
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:         On or about September 10, 2014 at a jobsite located at8507 Silverstone Court, Fort Smith, AR, employees performing work on the ground level such as cutting and handing up material were not wearing head protection, exposing them to the hazard of being struck by falling objects such as hammers and boards being used by employees on the roof and work platform above.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 C02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 7, 2014
Abate by
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use:    On or about September 10, 2014 at a jobsite located at8507 Silverstone Court, Fort Smith, AR, employees used a work platform supported by a GEHL Dynalift 553 rough terrain forklift with telescopic boom to install cedar siding on the gables at the front of the house.   The GEHL 553 Dynalift telescopic boom forklift operators manual prohibited the use of the equipment as a lift for personnel
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 7, 2014
Abate by
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): The employer used forklifts  to support scaffold platforms without ensuring that the entire platform was attached to the fork and that the forklift was not moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:    On or about September 10,, 2014 at a jobsite located at8507 Silverstone Court, Fort Smith, AR, the work platform supported by a GEHL Dynalift 553 rough terrain forklift was not attached to the forks.  Employees standing on the platform to install cedar siding on the gables at the front of the house were exposed to the hazard of falls to the ground below if the platform was to come off of the forks or move.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 7, 2014
Abate by
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:   On or about September 10,, 2014 at a jobsite located at8507 Silverstone Court, Fort Smith, AR, the work platform supported by a GEHL Dynalift 553 rough terrain forklift was not equipped with guardrails.  Employees standing on the platform to install cedar siding on the gables at the front of the house were exposed to the hazard of falls to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 7, 2014
Abate by
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    On or about September 10,, 2014 at a jobsite located at8507 Silverstone Court, Fort Smith, AR, employees installing cedar siding on the gables at the front of the house were not protected from falls while standing on the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View M H & S Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339945891.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.