KENNESAW, GA —
OSHA Inspection: SERGIO JIMENEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SERGIO JIMENEZ in 2705 HIGH POINT DRIVE, KENNESAW, GA 30152 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 339945933.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SERGIO JIMENEZ
- Site address
- 2705 HIGH POINT DRIVE
- City
- KENNESAW
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30152
- Mailing
- 3407 CUMBERLAND COURT APT. 6, CHAMBLEE, GA 30341
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: (a) The employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to ensure employees were able to recognize and avoid unsafe conditions and were knowledgeable on the methods to control or eliminate hazards associated with their work environment, such as, but not limited to, working from scaffold systems, using pneumatic nail guns and operating electrical powered tools. The employees were exposed to struck-by, electrical and fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: (a) Employees working from a pump jack scaffold were not trained in the recognition of the hazards associated with working from scaffold systems and the methods to control and minimize the hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 B02
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide: (a) On the north side of the residence, a scaffold system with a 10-inch wide work platform was being used by employees to install siding on a 2-story single family residence. The employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 19-feet to the next lower level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: (a) On the north side of the residence, the employer did not provide a safe means of access for employees using a pump jack scaffold to install siding on a two-story single family home, exposing the employees to a fall of approximately 19-feet to the next lower level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: (a) On the north side of the residence, employees were not protected from falling while installing siding from a pump jack scaffold on a 2-story residence without the use of a fall protection system. The employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 19-feet to the next lower level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary: (a) On the north side of the residence, the employer did not secure the bottom of the pump jack scaffold poles to prevent displacement. Employees were installing siding on a 2-story residence, exposed to a fall of approximately 19-feet to the next lower level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at Sergio Jimenez
View Sergio Jimenez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339945933.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.