SCIPIO CENTER, NY —
OSHA Inspection: ROACH'S DAIRY FARM
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROACH'S DAIRY FARM in 2227 STEWARTS CORNERS ROAD, SCIPIO CENTER, NY 13147 (NAICS 112120). OSHA activity number 339947830.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROACH'S DAIRY FARM
- Site address
- 2227 STEWARTS CORNERS ROAD
- City
- SCIPIO CENTER
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13147
- Mailing
- 2227 STEWARTS CORNERS ROAD, SCIPIO CENTER, NY 13147
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 112120
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a) On or about 9/10/2014, Generator Room: Employees were exposed to falls of up to twelve feet from an open sided second floor area. b) On or about 9/10/2014, Second Floor Eating Area: Employees were exposed to falls of up to ten feet from an unguarded stairway opening c) On or about 9/10/2014, Second Floor Eating Area: Employees were exposed to falls of up to ten feet from an open sided floor area used as a loading location. d) On or about 9/10/2014, Second Floor Eating Area: Employees were exposed to falls of up to ten feet down a staircase due to a lack of a hand rail. e) On or about 9/10/2014, Main Office Area: Employees were exposed to trip falls due to an unguarded floor hole in the concrete. f) On or about 9/10/2014, Second Floor Locker Area: Employees were exposed to trip falls due to an unguarded floor hole in the plywood. g) On or about 9/10/2014, Milk Storage Area: Employees were exposed to trip falls due to an unguarded floor opening inside of the access door from the chemical room. h) On or about 9/10/2014, Manure Digester Area: Employees were exposed to falls of eight feet into Weir's. Among other feasible and acceptable means of abatement would be to install top rails and midrails on the open sided floors, stair railings on stair cases with four or more risers, and covers over floor holes to comply with the American National Standards Institute, ANSI, Standard A1264.1-2007, Safety Requirements for Floor and Wall Openings, Railings, and Toeboards, Sections 3, 5 and 7. Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — I $420
- — Z $700
- — Z (S) $2800
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to chemical hazards: a) On or about 9/10/2014, Throughout the Farm: Employees were dispensing and using corrosive chemicals including, but not limited to Formaldehyde, Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Longline CIP, and Hi-Clean while performing cleaning operations and replenishing foot baths. Employees exposed to splash hazards. The employees were not provided with or using any eye and face protection, and were not provided with any eye wash facilities. Among other feasible and acceptable means of abatement would be to provide eyewash facilities that will provide 15 minutes of continuous flow of water and will comply with the American National Standards Institute, ANSI, Standard Z87.1 - 2003 Occupational and Educational Personal Eye and Face Protection Devices Section 6, and the American National Standards Institute, ANSI, Standard Z358.1- 1998 Emergency Eyewash and Shower Equipment Sections 6 and 7 . Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — I $4200
- — Z $7000
- — Z (S) $3500
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to asphyxiation or atmospheric hazards: a) On or about 9/10/2014, Throughout the Farm: Employees were required to enter into various confined spaces such as, but not limited to the Weirs and pits associated with the Manure Digester, and pits associated with the Manure collection system in order to open and close valves and clear blockages. Employees were exposed to atmosphere that were immediately dangerous to life and health. Among other feasible and acceptable means of abatement would be to identify and evaluated all of the potential confined spaces, implement a Confined Space Program which would include identifying and labeling confined spaces, performing atmospheric testing and monitoring, implementation of entry permits, ventilation, retrieval system, contractor entry and employee training. Also, comply with the American National Standards Institute, ANSI/ASSE Z117.1, Safety Requirements for Confined Spaces, Sections 3 through 17. Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — I $2520
- — Z $4200
- — Z (S) $3500
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to electrocution hazards: a) On or about 9/10/2014, In the Milk Room: A metal cased pump was not provided with a continuous path to ground. b) On or about 9/10/2014, In the Milk Room: An outlet intended for a wet location was not provided with a cover that would stay closed. c) On or about 9/10/2014, Second Floor, Bathroom/ Employee Area: A panel box had exposed energized parts. d) On or about 9/10/2014, Second Floor, Bathroom/ Employee Area: Outlets were not provided with covers, and had exposed energized parts. e) On or about 9/10/2014, Second Floor, Bathroom/ Employee Area: A light fixture was not secured, and was suspended by Romex. f) On or about 9/10/2014, Second Floor, Bathroom/ Employee Area: Energized Romex cable was crushed where it entered in the frame of metal cased unit. g) On or about 9/10/2014, Milking Parlor Area: A light fixture had exposed energized parts. h) On or about 9/10/2014, Milking Parlor Area: A section of conduit was pulled apart, exposing and chafing wiring. i) On or about 9/10/2014, Milking Parlor Area: A fan had its power cord pulled from its frame so that there was no longer any strain relief. Among other feasible and acceptable means of abatement would be to comply with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Code 70, National Electric Code, Articles 110 and 250. Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — I $480
- — Z $800
- — Z (S) $3500
1928.57 C01
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1928.57(c)(1)(i): All power take-off shafts of Farmstead equipment were not guarded by a master shield or other protective guarding: a) On or about 9/10/2014, Liquid Manure Transfer Area: No Power Take Off (PTO) guards were in place, on the rear of an International 1086 tractor, an International 4230 tractor, and a John Deere tractor, all being used in a stationary manner. Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1928.57 C02 I
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1928.57(c)(2)(i): The mesh or nip-points of all power driven gears, belts, chains, sheaves, pulleys, sprockets, and idlers were not guarded: a) On or about 9/10/2014, Liquid Manure Transfer Area: The belts and pulley on a PTO driven Houle manure pump was not completely guarded. b) On or about 9/10/2014, Piston Pump Room: The belts and pulleys on a Houle stationary manure pump were not completely guarded. Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — I $540
- — Z $900
- — Z (S) $0
1928.57 C04 I
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1928.57(c)(4)(i): Guards, shields, and access doors were not in place when equipment is in operation: a) On or about 9/10/2014, Separator Room: There was no guard in place on portions of the conveyor system. b) On or about 9/10/2014, Second Floor Storage Area, Above Milking Parlor: The moving metal bars of the cow retention system were not guarded where they came into contact with the floor. c) On or about 9/10/2014, Barn Area: A ventilation fan located 5 feet, six inches from the ground was not provided with a guard. Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Agriculture Reference: 1928.21(a)(5)). a) On or about 9/10/2014, Throughout the Farm: Employees were exposed to and using products and chemicals such as, but not limited to Copper Sulfate, Formaldehyde, Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Longline CIP, and Hi-Clean while performing cleaning operations and replenishing foot baths. Employees exposed to splash hazards. There was no hazard communication program developed and implemented. Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — I $1680
- — Z $2800
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: (Agriculture Reference: 1928.21(a)(5)). a) On or about 9/10/2014, Throughout the Farm: Employees were exposed to and using products and chemicals such as, but not limited to Copper Sulfate, Formaldehyde, Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Longline CIP, and Hi-Clean while performing cleaning operations and replenishing foot baths. Employees exposed to splash hazards. There were no Safety Data Sheets maintained on site. Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — I $0
- — Z $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Agriculture Reference: 1928.21(a)(5)). a) On or about 9/10/2014, Throughout the Farm: Employees were exposed to and using products and chemicals such as, but not limited to Copper Sulfate, Formaldehyde, Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Longline CIP, and Hi-Clean while performing cleaning operations and replenishing foot baths. Employees exposed to splash hazards. There was no training provided regarding the hazards associated with these chemicals/ materials. Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — I $0
- — Z $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Roach'S Dairy Farm
View Roach'S Dairy Farm's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 112120)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339947830.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.