Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BRANDING IRON HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRANDING IRON HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED in 1682 SAUGET BUSINESS BLVD, EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL 62206 (NAICS 311612). OSHA activity number 339956682.

Watch Branding Iron Holdings, Incorporated — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Branding Iron Holdings, Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1682 SAUGET BUSINESS BLVD
City
EAST SAINT LOUIS
State
IL
ZIP
62206
Mailing
1682 SAUGET BUSINESS BLVD, EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL 62206
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311612
Employees
350
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3000.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): When the employer had assessed the workplace hazard(s) and determined that hazard(s) were present, the employer did not select and/or use the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee from the hazard(s) identified:    Employees packing meat frozen to a temperature of approximately 5-10 degrees Fahrenheit were exposed to incipient stages of frostbite and the employer did not select protective gloves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.138 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.138(b): The employer did not base the selection of the appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the task(s) to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified:    Employees packing meat frozen to a temperature of approximately 5-10 degrees Fahrenheit were exposed to incipient stages of frostbite and the employer did not select protective gloves relative to the tasks performed and contact with the cold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $4900.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications or additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:     On or about September 16, 2014, employees performing work from forklift elevated work platforms at heights of 24 feet and less were exposed to the hazard of falling and forklift mast entanglement and the employer did not obtain the manufacturer's prior written approval for the addition of the work platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.215 B03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(3): The angular exposure of the grinding wheel periphery and sides for safety guards used on machines known as floor stand abrasive wheel grinders exceeded 90 deg. or one-fourth of the periphery:  Employees performing abrasive wheel grinding in the maintenance shop were exposed to struck-by hazards and the employer did not ensure angular exposure of the 2 pedestal grinders was 90 degrees or one-fourth of the periphery.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4000.00 · Current $2800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):  The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    Employees performing abrasive wheel grinding in the maintenance shop were exposed to struck-by hazards and the employer did not ensure the tongue guards on the 2 pedestal grinders housing guards were adjusted to within one fourth inch from the abrasive wheel periphery.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.305 J02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4000.00 · Current $2800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(iv): Receptacles installed in wet or damp locations were not suitable for the location:    In the shipping department, employees required to utilize or maintain the self-contained eyewash station were exposed to electric shock and the employer did not ensure the receptacle installed in a wet location were provided with a Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter function.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $4000

1904.33 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1000.00 · Current $700.00 Reduced
29 CFR �1904.33(a): The OSHA 300 Log, the OSHA 300A Summary, and the OSHA 301 Incident Reports (or equivalents), were not retained in the establishment for 5 years following the end of the calendar year to which they relate:    The employer did not retain the 2011 OSHA 300 Log as a completed form and the columns I through M6 were not retained or available for inspection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $700
  • — Z (O) $1000

View BRANDING IRON HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339956682.