EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: BRANDING IRON HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BRANDING IRON HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED in 1682 SAUGET BUSINESS BLVD, EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL 62206 (NAICS 311612). OSHA activity number 341064848.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRANDING IRON HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 1682 SAUGET BUSINESS BLVD
- City
- EAST SAINT LOUIS
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62206
- Mailing
- 1682 SAUGET BUSINESS BLVD, EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL 62206
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311612
- Employees
- 323
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $3,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D): Employees preforming servicing and maintenance on but not limited to Box Machines #1, #2, and the Breaders did not have energy control procedures specifying the following. (1) The procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the scope and purpose of the procedure. (2) The procedure did not specifically address electrical, hydraulic, or pneumatic sources within the procedural steps for shutting down the equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3300
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $2,640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by: Employees were exposed to in-running nip points when feeding materials on the Bosch Doboy CBS-D.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2640
- · Z (S) $4400
1910.147 C06 II
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The periodic inspection certification of energy control procedures did not contain the required documentation on identification of the machine or equipment, inspection date, employees included, and the person performing the inspection. The employer did not ensure periodic inspection certifications included all the required information.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Branding Iron Holdings, Incorporated
View Branding Iron Holdings, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311612)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341064848.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.