Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: PRECISION PRODUCTS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PRECISION PRODUCTS, INC. in 316 LIMIT ST., LINCOLN, IL 62656 (NAICS 333112). OSHA activity number 339960239.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Precision Products, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Precision Products, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
316 LIMIT ST.
City
LINCOLN
State
IL
ZIP
62656
Mailing
316 LIMIT ST., LINCOLN, IL 62656
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333112
Employees
158
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Jan 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,350 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): Floor(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition:     (a) Employees performing operations in the fabrication/welding area were exposed to the hazards of slipping and falling on concrete floor due to the accumulation of water on the floor of their welding stations.    (b) Employees were exposed to slip and trip hazards due to debris accumulated on the floor of the establishment, including exit routes.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1350
  • · C (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Jan 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:    Employees were exposed to caught-in hazards from the unguarded chain and sprocket from the wheel testing equipment station by the entrance to the fabrication/welding area.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1800
  • · C (S) $3600
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.254 D09 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Jan 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,350 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.254(d)(9)(iii): Cables with damaged insulation or exposed bare conductors were not replaced:      Employees were exposed to electrical hazards because the cables of several of the welding machines in the fabrication/welding area had damaged insulation covered by tape.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1350
  • · C (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Feb 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,350 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    Employees working in the fabrication/welding area were exposed to electrical shock hazards because a receptacle metal box with knockouts was attached to flexible cable to provide electricity to a light fixture. The metal box was not used according to their listing/labeling requirements.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1350
  • · C (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Feb 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,350 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:      Employees were exposed to electrical hazards from the use of flexible cords as a substitute for fixed wiring while providing electrical power to the wheel testing equipment station by the entrance to the fabrication/welding area.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1350
  • · C (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Jan 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,350 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Employees engaged in parts and equipment fabrication were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, welding fumes and spray paints and the employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program with at least a description of how the criteria for the following requirements would be met by the company:     a) use of labels and other forms of warning,     b) access to safety data sheets,     c) provision of hazardous chemical information and training to employees,     d) maintenance of an updated list of hazardous chemicals present at the facility,      e) methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks and hazards associated with chemicals contained in unlabeled pipes in their work areas.     f) methods the employer will use to inform other employers on-site on their  precautionary measures to protect employees during normal operating conditions and in foreseeable emergencies, the labeling system used in the workplace and to provide other employers on-site access to material safety data sheets.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1350
  • · C (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Jan 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier, signal word, hazard statement(s), pictogram(s), precautionary statement(s) and name, address, and telephone number of the chemical manufacturer, importer, or other responsible party:  Employees operating the presses use spray bottles containing lubricants that were not labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate health and physical hazard warning.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Jan 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  The employer did not develop and document a personal protective equipment hazard assessment for the welders, the written certification did not include the name of the person who certified that the evaluation had been performed, and the date that the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Jan 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  Employees engaged in welding operations were allowed to wear disposable dust masks (3M 8214 and 3M 8511) voluntarily and employees engaged in painting operations were allowed to wear MSA full face respirators and none were provided the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Precision Products, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339960239.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.