BUNNELL, FL —
OSHA Inspection: WILDKATZ, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WILDKATZ, INC. in 942 STONE LAKE DRIVE LOT 123, BUNNELL, FL 32110 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339966343.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WILDKATZ, INC.
- Site address
- 942 STONE LAKE DRIVE LOT 123
- City
- BUNNELL
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32110
- Mailing
- 155 DEEP WOODS WAY, ORMOND BEACH, FL 32174
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,320 · Current $1,320
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On or about September 19, 2014, employees walking inside the home while other employees are decking and installing facia on the roof were not wearing hard hats, exposing themselves to head injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1320
- — Z (S) $1320
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,390 · Current $5,390
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On or about September 19, 2014, back side of home, employees were using a Louisville 28-foot extension ladder to access and exit from the roof. The ladder was not extended 3 feet past the landing, exposing the employees to fall hazards. b. On or about September 19, 2014, front of the home, employees were using a 20-foot extension ladder to access and exit from the roof. The ladder was not extended 3 feet past the landing, exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5390
- — Z (S) $5390
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,390 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: a. On or about September 19, 2014, front of the home, employees were using an 8-foot Werner A-frame step ladder in the closed position to hold up a walk board which exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5390
1926.1053 B16
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,390 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired: a. On or about September 19, 2014, front of the home, employees were using a blue 20-foot extension ladder to access and exit from the roof area. The ladder was not extended 3 feet and had a large split or damaged side rail, exposing the employees to fall hazards. The employer did not withdraw the ladder from service or mark it as defective nor tagged it with "DO NOT USE".
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $5390
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $10,780 · Current $4,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a. On or about September 19, 2014, employees decking a 7:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling 9 feet 4-inches by the use of a guardrail system, safety net system or a personal fall arrest system. b. On or about September 19, 2014, the employee installing facia on a 7:12 pitch roof was not protected from falling 9 feet 4-inches by the use of a guardrail system, safety net system or a personal fall arrest system. The Wildkatz, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 944914, citation number 01, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on December 19, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 424 Wingspan Drive, Bunnell, FL.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4900
- — Z (R) $10780
More inspections at Wildkatz, INC.
View Wildkatz, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339966343.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.