Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TONY ROOFING SERVICE CORP

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TONY ROOFING SERVICE CORP in 80 KNOX ST, SPRINGFIELD, MA 01106 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339982795.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tony Roofing Service Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tony Roofing Service Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
80 KNOX ST
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
MA
ZIP
01106
Mailing
69 HARVARD ST, BROCKTON, MA 02301
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 14, 2014
Abate by
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent and continuous:  (a) 80 Knox St., Springfield, MA: On or about October 2, 2014, an employee was observed using a circular saw that was powered through an extension cord that did not have a continuous path to ground as its grounding plug had been removed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 14, 2014
Abate by
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and/or other points as necessary:  (a) 80 Knox St., Springfield, MA: On or about October 2, 2014, 2 employees were working from a pump jack scaffold system platform, more than 14 feet above the ground below, whose poles had only been secured at the top.   Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 14, 2014
Abate by
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  (a) 80 Knox St., Springfield, MA: On or about October 2, 2014, an employee was observed working while standing on the pump mechanism of the single "Alum-A-Pole" scaffold pole which was not part of any scaffold system, without any fall protection more than 14 feet above the ground below.   Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 14, 2014
Abate by
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder is approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):  (a) 80 Knox St., Springfield, MA: On or about October 2, 2014, an employee was working from an aluminum extension ladder that was used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was nearly one-half of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 14, 2014
Abate by
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were not used only on stable and level surfaces:  (a) 80 Knox St., Springfield, MA: On or about October 2, 2014, an employee was observed working from an aluminum extension ladder that was placed with one leg on a piece of scrap wood which was placed on discarded roofing shingles , and the other leg was placed on some aluminum debris, also resting on top of discarded shingles, neither of which would be considered a stable and/or level surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

View Tony Roofing Service Corp's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339982795.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.