ATHENS, GA —
OSHA Inspection: MCCANN AEROSPACE MACHINING CORP
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MCCANN AEROSPACE MACHINING CORP in 180 TRANS TECH DRIVE, ATHENS, GA 30601 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339984734.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MCCANN AEROSPACE MACHINING CORP
- Site address
- 180 TRANS TECH DRIVE
- City
- ATHENS
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30601
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 80408, ATHENS, GA 30608
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 200
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards. On or about October 2, 2014 at the SNK#5, an employee that has to pin and bolt down pieces of material on a working platform 49 inches above the adjacent floor was not protected from falling by a standard guard rail system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.147 C04 II C
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tag out devices and the responsibility for them. On or about October 2, 2014 at 180 Trans Tech drive, Athens, GA: Employees were exposed to sudden energization or start-up of multi-energy sources machinery. During the programmatic review of the lockout/tag out machine specific procedures for the milling machines and CNC machines it was revealed that there were deficiencies in the lockout/tag out specific procedures. Specific procedural steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tag out devices and the responsibility for them. a. SNK #1 - Employees are exposed to an amputation hazard, there are not procedures to lockout and tag out the machine when a fault is found. The machine is turned off and the feed is turned to zero to clear the fault. b. SNK #2 - Employees are exposed to an amputation hazard, there are not procedures to lockout and tag out the machine when a fault is found. The machine is turned off and the feed is turned to zero to clear the fault. c. SNK #3 - Employees are exposed to an amputation hazard, there are not procedures to lockout and tag out the machine when a fault is found. The machine is turned off and the feed is turned to zero to clear the fault. d. Mazak 1400 #1- Employees are exposed to an amputation hazard, when employee go into the CNC machines. The machine is manually stopped, the feed rate is turned to zero and the employees walk into the doors to check the parts being turned. e. Mazak 1400 #2- Employees are exposed to an amputation hazard, when employee go into the CNC machines. The machine is manually stopped, the feed rate is turned to zero and the employees walk into the doors to check the parts being turned. f. Makino #1 - Employees are exposed to an amputation hazard, when employee go into the CNC machines. The machine is manually stopped, the feed rate is turned to zero and the employees walk into the doors to check the parts being turned. g. SNK #5 - Employees are exposed to an amputation hazard, there are not procedures to lockout and tag out the machine when a fault is found. The machine is turned off and the feed is turned to zero to clear the fault.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. On or about October 2, 2014 at 180 Trans Tech Drive, Athens, GA.: Where employees were exposed to machine guarding hazard(s) to include but not limited to: a. White Puck machine, when the Plexiglas guard was removed employees were exposed to an amputation hazard. b. Cincinnati Malacron milling machine, when the guard was removed, flying aluminum chips are thrown into the aisles that could strike the employees walking through the area. The milling machine is not guarded exposing employees to a struck-by hazard. c. SNK#1, the key on the positive-break safety interlock was removed, allowing the door of the machine to be opened during operation and the employees to enter the machine. The employees were exposed to a caught-by hazard they venture into the machine. d. SNK#2, the key on the positive-break safety interlock was removed, allowing the door of the machine to be opened during operation and the employees to enter the machine. The employees were exposed to a caught-by hazard they venture into the machine. e. Makino#1, the positive-break safety interlock does not work. When the doors are open the machine will continue to run, exposing the employee to a caught-by hazard. f. SNK#5, the positive-break safety interlock does not work. When the doors are open the machine will continue to run, exposing the employee to a caught-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6300
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,400 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch. On or about October 2, 2014 in the conventional area, the adjustable tongue guard on the Jet 8" Bench Grinder was not adjusted to 1/4 of an inch opening as the wheel wore away. The employees making adjustment to screws, parts, and drill bits are exposed to flying parts and debris from broken tools and disintegrating abrasive wheels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $5400
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Feb 11, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. On or about October 2, 2014 employees that used compressed air to clean off metal chips and fines from the machines and parts were exposed to a embolism hazard when the air pressure could not be reduced below 30 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $4500
More inspections at Mccann Aerospace Machining Corp
View Mccann Aerospace Machining Corp's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339984734.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.