GUYMON, OK ·
OSHA Inspection: SEABOARD FOODS LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SEABOARD FOODS LLC in 2700 N 28TH ST., GUYMON, OK 73942 (NAICS 311612). OSHA activity number 339991457.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SEABOARD FOODS LLC
- Site address
- 2700 N 28TH ST.
- City
- GUYMON
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 73942
- Mailing
- 2700 NE 28TH STREET, GUYMON, OK 73942
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311612
- Employees
- 2527
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.24 I
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.24(i): The employer does not ensure the vertical clearance above the stair tread to an overhead obstruction was at least 7 feet measured from the leading edge of the tread. The violation occurred outside of the Main Ammonia Refrigeration Room on or about October 8, 2014 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to a struck-by and fall hazard when the employer failed to ensure at least a 7-foot vertical overhead clearance where pipe obstructions hindered access at the top of the stair platform to the elevated ammonia refrigeration receiver. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure vertical clearance above the stair tread to an overhead obstruction was at least 7 feet measured from the leading edge of the tread.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $5000
- · F (O) $1500
- · Z (S) $5000
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not ensure that it documents that equipment in the process complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP). a. The violation occurred in the Main Engine Room and the Valve Alley Enclosure on or about October 8, 2014 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to fire, explosion, and/or inhalation hazards when the employer failed to ensure emergency mechanical ventilation system(s) was activated by an ammonia detector; OR ran continuously and provided with an alarm to detect failure or shutdown of the system in accordance with ASHRAE-15. b. The violation occurred in the Main Engine Room and the Valve Alley Enclosure on or about October 8, 2014 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to fire, explosion, and/or inhalation hazards when the employer failed to ensure that emergency mechanical ventilation system(s) was on a separate electrical circuit and had a control switch immediately outside the entrance door to the machine room in accordance with ASHRAE-15 and IIAR 2. c. This instance deleted d. The violation occurred in the GCS and Main Engine Rooms on or about October 8, 2014 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to fire, explosion, and/or inhalation hazards when the employer failed to ensure the thickness of severely corroded un-insulated piping ammonia piping was in accordance IIAR 2 and IIAR 110. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure it documented that equipment in the process complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $7000
- · F (S) $3500
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.119 F01 IV
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iv): The employer does not ensure written procedures address the requirements for the safety systems and their functions. The violation occurred in the Main and GCS Ammonia Refrigeration Systems on or about October 8, 2014 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to fire, explosion, and/or inhalation hazards from ammonia vapors when the employer failed to ensure the written operating procedures addressed the requirements for the safety systems and their functions. Identified safety systems and functions include but not limited to: a. High Discharge Pressure Shuts Down Compressors b. High Discharge Temperature Shuts Down Compressors c. High/Low Oil Pressure Differential Shuts Down Compressors d. High Accumulator Level Shuts Down Compressors e. Low Accumulator Level Shuts Down Pumps f. Ammonia Detector Alarms and Interlock Activation Of Ventilation System(s) g. Emergency Stops Outside of Entry to Engine Room Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure written procedures address the requirements for the safety systems and their functions.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $7000
- · F (S) $3500
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.119 F04
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(4): The employer does not ensure development and implementation of safe work practices for control over entrance into a facility by maintenance, contractor, laboratory, and other personnel. a. The violation occurred in the GCS, Main, and Valve Alley enclosure/machine rooms on or about October 8, 2014 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to fire, explosion, and/or inhalation hazards from ammonia vapors when the employer failed to ensure it developed and implemented written procedures for controlling access into the ammonia refrigeration facility and equipment by maintenance, contractor, production, and other personnel. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure development and implementation of safe work practices for control over entrance into a facility by maintenance, contractor, laboratory, and other personnel.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $7000
- · F (O) $3500
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.119 G01
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(1)(i): The employer does not ensure employees involved in operating a process are provided initial training that included emphasis on specific safety and health hazards of the process and emergency operations including shutdown and safe work practices applicable to the employees job tasks. a. The violation occurred in the GCS and Main Ammonia Refrigeration Areas on or about October 8, 2014 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to fire, explosion, and/or inhalation hazards when the employer failed to ensure initial training was provided for employees who operated ammonia refrigeration equipment that included emergency shutdown, written operating procedures, and safe work practices. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure employees involved in operating a process are provided initial training that included emphasis on specific safety and health hazards of the process and emergency operations including shutdown, and safe work practices applicable to the employees job tasks.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $7000
- · F (S) $0
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer does not ensure written procedures are established and implemented to maintain the on-going mechanical integrity of process equipment. The violation occurred in the GCS and Main Ammonia Refrigeration Engine Rooms on or about October 8, 2014 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to fire, explosion, and/or inhalation hazards from ammonia vapors when the employer failed to ensure detailed written procedures were established and implemented for the testing and/or inspection of safety systems. Identified safety systems include but not limited to: a. Compressor Discharge High/Low Pressure b. Compressor High/Low Oil Pressure Differential c. Compressor High Discharge Temperature d. Emergency Shutdown Systems (E-Stop) e. Emergency Ventilation Systems f. High/Low Vessel Levels g. Ammonia Detectors h. Pressure Relief Valve Vents. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure written procedures are established and implemented to maintain the on-going mechanical integrity of process equipment.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $7000
- · F (S) $3500
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.119 J04 I
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i): The employer does not ensure that inspections and tests were performed on process equipment to maintain its mechanical integrity. The violation occurred in the GCS and Main ammonia refrigeration engine rooms on or about October 8, 2014 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to fire, explosion, and/or inhalation hazards from ammonia vapors when the employer failed to ensure inspection and tests were performed on process equipment such as but not limited to: a. Machine/Engine Room Emergency Shutdown (E-Stop) b. Machine/Engine Room Emergency Ventilation Systems c. Compressor High Discharge Temperature Cut Out d. Ammonia System Shut off /King Valves Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure that inspections and tests were performed on process equipment to maintain its mechanical integrity.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $0
- · R (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.119 J04 II
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): The employer does not ensure that inspection and testing procedures performed on process equipment to maintain its mechanical integrity followed recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP). The violation occurred in the GCS and Main ammonia refrigeration engine rooms on or about October 8, 2014 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to fire, explosion, and/or inhalation hazards from ammonia vapors when the employer failed to ensure testing and inspections of safety systems were conducted in accordance with RAGAGEP for safety systems such as but not limited to: a. Compressor High Discharge Pressure Cut Out b. Compressor High/Low Oil Pressure Differential Cut Out c. High/Low Accumulator Vessel Level Cut Out d. Ammonia Detectors Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure that inspection and testing procedures performed on process equipment to maintain its mechanical integrity followed recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP).
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $0
- · F (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.212 A05
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(5): The employer does not ensure fan guard openings on the periphery of the blades is no larger than one-half (1/2) inch. a. The violation was observed in the Main Ammonia Refrigeration Engine Room on October 8, 2014. Employees were exposed to caught-in hazards when the employer failed to ensure the guard on the portable fan had openings smaller than one-half (1/2) inch. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure fan guard openings on the periphery of the blades is no larger than one-half (1/2) inch.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $4000
- · F (S) $0
- · Z (S) $4000
1910.303 B06
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(6): The employer does not ensure electrical equipment is not located in damp and damp or wet location that have a deteriorating effect on the equipment. a. The violation occurred in the Condenser Supply Pump enclosure on or about October 8, 2014 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to electrocution hazards when the employer failed to ensure electrical equipment is not located in damp and damp or wet location that have a deteriorating effect on the equipment. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure electrical equipment is not located in damp and damp or wet location that have a deteriorating effect on the equipment.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $7000
- · F (S) $0
- · Z (S) $7000
More inspections at Seaboard Foods LLC
View Seaboard Foods LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311612)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339991457.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.