Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: BENNETT PACKAGING

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of BENNETT PACKAGING in 220 N.W. SPACE CENTER CIRCLE, LEES SUMMIT, MO 64064 (NAICS 322211). OSHA activity number 339997348.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bennett Packaging for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bennett Packaging is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BENNETT PACKAGING
Site address
220 N.W. SPACE CENTER CIRCLE
City
LEES SUMMIT
State
MO
ZIP
64064
Mailing
220 N.W. SPACE CENTER CIRCLE, LEES SUMMIT, MO 64064
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322211
Employees
180
Ownership type
Private (A)

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2014
Abate by
Jan 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:  a) At Bennett Packaging:  The employer do not provided affected employee with an annual hearing test evaluation.  1) An employee working in the automantan line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 63% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 86.71 dBA.  The sampling was performed for 487 minutes during one shift on October 21, 2014.  2) An employee working in the transline line (infeeder) was exposed to continuous noise levels at 120.7% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.36 dBA.  The sampling was performed for 465 minutes during one shift on October 21, 2014.  3) An employee working in the transline line (outfeeder) was exposed to continuous noise levels at 112.7% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.86 dBA.  The sampling was performed for 464 minutes during one shift on October 21, 2014.  4) An employee working in the transline line (outfeeder) was exposed to continuous noise levels at 89% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.16 dBA.  The sampling was performed for 462 minutes during one shift on October 21, 2014.  5) An employee working in the transline line (infeeder) was exposed to continuous noise levels at 116.5% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.10 dBA.  The sampling was performed for 460 minutes during one shift on October 21, 2014.  6) An employee working in the Hycorr line (infeeder) was exposed to continuous noise levels at 120% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 91.32 dBA.  The sampling was performed for 468 minutes during one shift on October 21, 2014.  7) An employee working in the Hycorr line (feeder) was exposed to continuous noise levels at 167.3% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 93.71 dBA.  The sampling was performed for 463 minutes during one shift on October 21, 2014.  8) An employee working in the Young Shin (flatbed feeder) line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 67.7% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.19 dBA.  The sampling was performed for 456 minutes during one shift on October 21, 2014.  9) An employee working in the Jumbo stacker line (outfeeder) was exposed to continuous noise levels at 56.2% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 85.84 dBA.  The sampling was performed for 455 minutes during one shift on October 21, 2014.  10) An employee working in the Baller Bloapco line was exposed to continuous noise levels at 95.5% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.67 dBA.  The sampling was performed for 447 minutes during one shift on October 21, 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2520
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2014
Abate by
Dec 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer:  (a)  At Bennett Packaging:  The employer did not provided training to employees on the changes in the Hazard Communication Standard.  Employees do not recognized the labels or SDS.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2520
  • · Z (S) $3600

View Bennett Packaging's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339997348.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.