Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BADGER RAILING INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BADGER RAILING INC. in 3880 W. MILWAUKEE RD., MILWAUKEE, WI 53208 (NAICS 332323). OSHA activity number 340005909.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Badger Railing INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Badger Railing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BADGER RAILING INC.
Site address
3880 W. MILWAUKEE RD.
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53208
Mailing
3880 W. MILWAUKEE RD., MILWAUKEE, WI 53208
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332323
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to potential crushing injuries from a falling load while using a lifting device which was not determined to be safe.    The in-house fabricated lifting hooks used in the painting area had no labels or tags to identify them, had not been load-tested or certified as to their ability to lift, had not been inspected to identify wear and tear, and had not been inspected to identify damage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.107 B05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i):  Visible gauges or audible alarm or pressure activated devices were not installed to indicate or insure that the required air velocity was maintained:      (a)     The two paint booths had no visible gauge, audible alarm or pressure activated device to insure that air velocity was maintained.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.107 G02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:    (a)     The paint booths had overspray accumulation on the floors and walls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.107 G03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2015
Abate by
Mar 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(3): Residue scrapings and debris contaminated with residue were not immediately removed from the premises and properly disposed of.  Approved metal waste cans were not provided wherever rags or waste are impregnated with finishing material and all such rags or waste were not deposited therein immediately after use.  The contents of waste cans were not properly disposed of at least once daily or at the end of each shift:    (a)     In the painting area the waste such as the swept up paint dust, rags with paint and solvent, and the used gloves were placed into plastic waste cans that were not emptied daily.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a)     Painters were required to wear half-face and full-face, negative pressure respirators and did not have a medical determination conducted by a physician or other licensed health care provider.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    (a)     Painters were required to wear half-face and full-face, negative pressure respirators and did not have either a qualitative or quantitative fit test performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:    (a)     The painter had a growth of facial hair that came between the sealing surface of his half-face respirator and his full-face respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 I05 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(iii): The compressors used to supply breathing air were not provided with suitable in-line air-purifying sorbent beds and filters to further ensure breathing air quality:      (a)     The breathing air used by the painter for his loose-fitting hood supplied air respirator did not pass through an air-purifying sorbent bed and filter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2100

View Badger Railing INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340005909.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.