Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MANUEL PEREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MANUEL PEREZ in 371 LAPERLA DR., SUGAR HILL, GA 30518 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340025774.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Manuel Perez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Manuel Perez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MANUEL PEREZ
Site address
371 LAPERLA DR.
City
SUGAR HILL
State
GA
ZIP
30518
Mailing
5818 DARRY CIRCLE, NORCROSS, GA 30093
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2014
Abate by
Nov 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  On or about October 21, 2014, employees were exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not have a hazard communication program.  Employees used chemicals such as, but not limited to, mortar mix which contained silica and was corrosive.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2014
Abate by
Nov 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they used:   On or about October 21, 2014, employees were exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not a safety data sheet for each chemical in use.  Employees used chemicals such as, but not limited to, mortar mix which contained silica and was corrosive.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2014
Abate by
Nov 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59):  On or about October 21, 2014, employees were exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not  provide employees information on the location of the program and MSDS, or employee training.  Employees used chemicals such as, but not limited to, mortar mix which contained silica and was corrosive.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2014
Abate by
Nov 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  On or about October 21, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards when the second level of the scaffold was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2014
Abate by
Nov 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.    On or about October 21, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards when there was no ladder to access the scaffold levels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2014
Abate by
Nov 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  On or about October 21, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards when guardrails on the second level were missing or incorrectly installed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3000

View Manuel Perez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340025774.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.