WALLINGFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: R & L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, L.L.C.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of R & L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, L.L.C. in 90 NORTH PLAINS INDUSTRIAL ROAD, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492 (NAICS 484122). OSHA activity number 340039171.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- R & L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, L.L.C.
- Site address
- 90 NORTH PLAINS INDUSTRIAL ROAD
- City
- WALLINGFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06492
- Mailing
- 600 GILLAM RD, WILMINGTON, OH 45177
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 484122
- Employees
- 9000
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.38 C01
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $0 Reduced
2390
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(1): Minimum elements of an emergency action plan. An emergency action plan must include at a minimum the procedures for reporting a fire other emergency: Terminal: The employer's emergency action plan did not include the procedures for reporting emergency related events within appropriate time frames and steps.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $6600
- · Z (S) $6600
1910.38 F03
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $0 Reduced
2390
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(f)(3): Review of emergency action plan. An employer must review the emergency action plan with each employee covered by this plan when the plan is changed: Terminal: The employer did not review and/or effectively communicate the emergency action plan (EAP) with each employee covered by this plan since the EAP has been revised and updated in 2011 and 2014.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $6600
- · Z (S) $6600
1910.120 Q03 I
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $6,600
05602390
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(i): The senior emergency response official responding to an emergency did not become the individual in charge of a site-specific Incident Command System (ICS): Facility: The "senior official", who was a designated individual from a third party company to respond to an emergency was not present on the site and was unable to become the individual in charge of the site-specific Incident Command System (ICS).
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $6600
- · C (S) $6600
- · Z (S) $6600
1910.120 Q03 II
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
05602390
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(ii): The individual in charge of the incident command system did not identify, to the extent possible, all hazardous substances or conditions present and did not address, as appropriate, site analysis, use of engineering controls, maximum exposure limits, hazardous substance handling procedures and the use of any new technologies: Loading Dock: Employees were exposed to chemical, fire and explosive hazards when the managment did not evaluate the chemical that was spilled in order to aid in the selection of appropriate employee protection methods prior to applying sorbent materials to the area where the chemical was leaking from the punctured drum.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.120 Q03 III
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
05602390
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iii): Based on the hazardous substances and/or conditions present, the individual in charge of the ICS did not implement appropriate emergency operations and did not ensure that the personal protective equipment worn was appropriate for the hazards encountered Loading Dock: Employees were exposed to chemical, fire and explosive hazards when the individual in charge did not ensure that the proper PPE was selected and worn by the personnel that was performing as first responder operations level at a chemical spill.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.120 Q03 IV
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
05602390
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iv): Employees engaged in emergency response and exposed to hazardous substances presenting an inhalation hazard or potential inhalation hazard, did not wear positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus until such time that the individual in charge of the incident command system determined through the use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection would not result in hazardous exposures to employees: Loading Dock: An employee was exposed to potential inhalation hazards when the individual in charge did not provide respiratory protection while performing work as a first responder operations level at a chemical spill.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.120 Q06 V
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
05602390
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(v): Incident commanders, who will assume control of the incident scene beyond the first responder awareness level, shall receive at least 24 hours of training equal to the first responder operations level and in addition have competency in the following areas outline in 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(v)(A) through (q)(6)(v)(F) and the employer shall so certify: Facility: The company exposed employees to chemical and physical hazards by designating a third party company, who is off site, to be the incident commander and implement appropriate emergency operations.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 N07 III
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(n)(7)(iii): 1910.178(n)(7)(iii): On all grades the load and load engaging means were not tilted back if applicable, and were not raised only as far as necessary to clear the road surface. Loading Dock: The employer did not ensure that the operator was driving with the load engaging means/forks of the powered industrial truck as low to the ground as possible.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $6600
- · Z (S) $6600
1910.120 Q01
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $33,000 · Current $6,600 Reduced
2390
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): The employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations: Terminal: The employer did not establish and implement an Emergency Response Plan (ERP) when they were performing as first responder operations level at a chemical spill and were exposed to chemical, fire and explosive hazards. R & L Carriers Shared Services, L.L.C. was previously cited for a violation of an equivalent occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(2)(I-XI) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315156828, citation number 1, items number 1 (A-K) and was affirmed as a final order on October 04, 2011, with respect to a workplace located at 4359 W. 36th Street Chicago IL 60632.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $6600
- · C (R) $33000
- · Z (R) $33000
1910.120 Q06 II
- Issued
- Feb 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $27,500 · Current $6,600 Reduced
05602390
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(ii): First responders at the operational level did not receive at least eight hours of training or did not have sufficient experience to objectively demonstrate competency in the areas required by 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(ii)(A) through (q)(6)(ii)(F) and/or the employer did not so certify: Facility: Employees were exposed to chemical, fire and explosive hazards at a chemical spill were not trained to at least the minimum level of training required by this section when they were performing as first responder operations level. R & L Carriers Shared Services, L.L.C. was previously cited for a violation of an equivalent occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(I) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315156828, citation number 1, items number 1 L and was affirmed as a final order on October 04, 2011, with respect to a workplace located at 4359 W. 36th Street Chicago IL 60632.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $6600
- · C (R) $27500
- · Z (R) $27500
More inspections at R & L Carriers Shared Services, L.L.C.
View R & L Carriers Shared Services, L.L.C.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 484122)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340039171.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.