NEWARK, DE —
OSHA Inspection: B.F. RICH COMPANY INCORPORATED
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of B.F. RICH COMPANY INCORPORATED in 322 RUTHAR DRIVE POB 6031, NEWARK, DE 19714 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 340062298.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- B.F. RICH COMPANY INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 322 RUTHAR DRIVE POB 6031
- City
- NEWARK
- State
- DE
- ZIP
- 19714
- Mailing
- 322 RUTHAR DRIVE POB 6031, NEWARK, DE 19714
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326199
- Employees
- 240
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a) B.F. Rich Company Incorporated - The employer failed to adequately develop, document and utilize energy control procedures for their employees who serviced or performed maintenance on hazardous equipment [e.g Frame Cutting Machine, Saw Optimizer machine, Foam Operation Machines] within the facility. This was observed on October 30, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees: a) B.F. Rich Company Incorporated - The employer did not provide annual training for their employees who routinely repair and service the machines. This was observed on October 30, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck: a) B.F rich Company Incorporated - The employer did not provide employees who operated the Hyster propane powered industrial trucks [e.g Models S80XL, S50FT] with comprehensive training. This was observed on October 30, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3150
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: a) B.F. Rich Company Incorporated - The employer did not ensure that an adequate inspection of the propane powered Hyster industrial trucks [e.g. models S89XL and S50FT] were conducted prior to being operated by the employees in the production facility. This was observed on October 30, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) B.F. Rich Company Incorporated - The employer provided a chop saw in the production area of the facility which had an inadequate guard on it did not properly enclose the rotating part, which exposed the employees fingers to a point of operation hazard. This was observed on October 30, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning. Compressed air shall not be used for cleaning purposes except where reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. and then only with effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment. a) B.F.Rich Company Incorporated. - Several Employees are exposed to eye injuries and/or skin embolism when operating compressed air nozzles. Employees were operating the equipment to clean the surfaces of their work areas and themselves which were identified without restrictor valves. The compress air nozzles being operated were measured releasing a stream of air pressure between approximately 40 to 80 P.S.I. This was observed on October 30, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3150
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.1200 F06
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): Workplace labeling. Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section, the employer shall ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked with either: a) B.F. Rich Co Incorporated -The employer did not label the 4-8 ounce containers of hazardous liquids being used by the employees to clean the surfaces in the production area of the facility. This was observed on October 30, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3150
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a) B.F. Rich Company Incorporated. - Employee who handle hazardous chemical products [e.g. Xylene, Aliphatic and Aromatic Hydrocarbons], were not provided training on the new labels and safety data sheet format which was instituted in December of 2013. This was observed on October 30, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at B.F. Rich Company Incorporated
View B.F. Rich Company Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326199)
More inspections in DE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340062298.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.