Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: M&M VEHICLE CORP.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of M&M VEHICLE CORP. in 19873 HWY 22 WEST, MEXICO, MO 65265 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 340068915.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M&M Vehicle Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M&M Vehicle Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
M&M VEHICLE CORP.
Site address
19873 HWY 22 WEST
City
MEXICO
State
MO
ZIP
65265
Mailing
19873 HWY 22 WEST, MEXICO, MO 65265
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
29
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Jan 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer shall establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with work site-specific procedures:  In the powder coat booth for the employee(s) who wore a Bullard Supplied Air Respirator with hood (CC20 Series, Type C Continuous Flow, TC-19C-154) for powder coat painting operations, a written respiratory protection program had not been developed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Jan 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  In the powder coat booth for the employee(s) who wore a Bullard Supplied Air Respirator with hood (CC20 Series, Type C Continuous Flow, TC-19C-154) for powder coat painting operations, without having received a medical evaluation to first determine the employee's ability to use the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Jan 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields:  Suitable screens or the equivalent were not installed during MIG welding operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Jan 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:  At the shop, for employees who used chemicals including but not limited to POWDURA TGIC Polyester Powder Coating, Raven Texture II and corrosive BLUE MAX, a written hazard communication program had not been developed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 J01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Jan 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(j)(1): Employers did not train employees regarding the new label elements and safety data sheets format by December 1, 2013:  At the shop, for employees who used chemicals including but not limited to POWDURA TGIC Polyester Powder Coating, Raven Texture II and corrosive BLUE MAX, training on the new safety data sheet, pictograms and labeling system (Global Harmonization System training) had not been conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Jan 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section, the employer shall ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked with the identity and hazard warning:  In the Wash Pit, the open bath tank of diluted aluminum brightener (BLU MAX) was not labeled with the identity and hazard warning.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View M&M Vehicle Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340068915.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.