SOUTH BAY, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: OKEELANTA CORPORATION
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of OKEELANTA CORPORATION in 21250 U.S. HIGHWAY 27, SOUTH BAY, FL 33493 (NAICS 311312). OSHA activity number 340103704.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OKEELANTA CORPORATION
- Site address
- 21250 U.S. HIGHWAY 27
- City
- SOUTH BAY
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33493
- Mailing
- 21250 U.S. HIGHWAY 27, SOUTH BAY, FL 33493
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311312
- Employees
- 850
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.120 Q03 III
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,675 · Current $2,805 Reduced
1430
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iii): Based on the hazardous substances and/or conditions present, the individual in charge of the ICS did not implement appropriate emergency operations and did not ensure that the personal protective equipment worn was appropriate for the hazards encountered: On or about November 25th,2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn while an employee responded to an emergency.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2805
- · Z (S) $4675
1910.120 Q03 IV
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,675 · Current $2,805 Reduced
1430
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iv): Employees engaged in emergency response and exposed to hazardous substances presenting an inhalation hazard or potential inhalation hazard, did not wear positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA)until such time that the individual in charge of the incident command system determined through the use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection would not result in hazardous exposures to employees: On or about November 25th,2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that an employee would wear a SCBA until air monitoring determined it was not necessary while the employee was responding to a muriatic acid spill.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2805
- · Z (S) $4675
1910.120 Q06 I
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,675 · Current $2,805 Reduced
1430
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(i): First responders at the awareness level did not have sufficient training or have sufficient experience to objectively demonstrate competency in the areas covered by 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(i)(A) through (q)(6)(i)(F): On or about November 25th,2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not provide training for those employees that would notify authorities after being witness and/or discover a hazardous substance release.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $2805
- · Z (S) $4675
1910.120 Q06 III
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1430
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii): Employees who participated as hazardous materials technicians, or were expected to participate as hazardous materials technicians, had not received at least 24 hours of training equal to the first responder operations level, and in addition have competency in the areas outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(A) through (q)(6)(iii)(I) and/or the employer did not so certify: On or about November 25th,2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not provide the required training for those employees that would attempt to stop a hazardous substance release such as but not limited to muriatic acid.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.120 Q02 I
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(2)(i): The emergency response plan did not address, to the extent not addressed elsewhere, pre-emergency planning and coordination with outside parties: On or about November 25th,2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer's emergency response plan did not include outside parties information while used during emergency response operations.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.120 Q02 IV
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(2)(iv): The emergency response plan did not address, to the extent not addressed elsewhere, safe distances and places of refuge: On or about November 25th,2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer's emergency response plan did not include safe distances in case of an emergency response event.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.120 Q02 XI
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(2)(xi): The emergency response plan did not address, to the extent not addressed elsewhere, personal protective equipment and emergency equipment: On or about November 25th,2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer's emergency response plan did not include personal protective equipment and emergency equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Okeelanta Corporation
View Okeelanta Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311312)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340103704.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.