WINFIELD, AL —
OSHA Inspection: KING KUTTER, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KING KUTTER, INC. in 305 COMMERCE DRIVE, WINFIELD, AL 35594 (NAICS 333111). OSHA activity number 340147982.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KING KUTTER, INC.
- Site address
- 305 COMMERCE DRIVE
- City
- WINFIELD
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 35594
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 1200, WINFIELD, AL 35594
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333111
- Employees
- 130
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A03
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,375 · Current $1,688 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wore prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involved eye hazards wore eye protection that incorporated the prescription in its design, or wore eye protection that could be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses: (a) On or about 12/16/14 - in the Fabrication area, the employer did not ensure that employees used adequate eye protection when exposed to flying particles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1687.5
- — Z (S) $3375
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) On or about 12/16/14 - in the Fabrication area, the Scotchman Ironworker was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3150
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.213 H04
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,375 · Current $1,688 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(4): Radial saw(s) were not installed in a manner so as to cause the cutting head to return gently to the starting position when released by the operator: (a) On or about 12/16/14 - at the Packaging area, the radial saw cutting head did not return to the starting position when released.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1687.5
- — Z (S) $3375
1910.217 C01 I
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press(es): (a) On or about 12/16/14 - in the Fabrication area, the Heim 300-ton mechanical press was not guarded at the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3150
- — Z (S) $6300
More inspections at King Kutter, INC.
View King Kutter, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333111)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340147982.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.