Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WHITLOCK PACKAGING CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of WHITLOCK PACKAGING CORPORATION in 92 N. MAIN STREET, WHARTON, NJ 07885 (NAICS 312111). OSHA activity number 340150754.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Whitlock Packaging Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Whitlock Packaging Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
92 N. MAIN STREET
City
WHARTON
State
NJ
ZIP
07885
Mailing
92 N. MAIN STREET, WHARTON, NJ 07885
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
312111
Employees
350
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 G05 II

Willful Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2015
Abate by
Jul 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $60,500 · Current $45,375 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(ii): Where mobile test vans were used to meet the audiometric testing obligation, the employer did not obtain a valid baseline audiogram within 1 year of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level:    a) Facility    The employer did not obtain a valid baseline audiogram for permanent and temporary employees' first exposure at or above the action level of 85 dBA as an 8 hour time-weighted average.    A permanent employee whose first exposure to noise above the action level on 02/25/13 and working at Line 3 Filler B area was exposed to continuous noise up to 163.0% of the permissible exposure limit (PEL) eight hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA which is 1.6 times the allowable exposure limit, respectively.  The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 93.5 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 443 minutes on 03/12/15, with the unsampled portion of time considered to represent zero for the exposure calculation.  On 03/12/15, there was no change in operation identified from the date Line 3 Filler B was initially observed on 12/01/14.    A permanent employee whose first exposure to noise above the action level on 11/19/12 and working at Line 4 Filler area was exposed to continuous noise up to 116.1% of the action level (AL) eight hour time-weighted average sound level on 85 dBA which is 2.3 times the allowable exposure limit, respectively.  The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 91.1 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 440 minutes on 03/12/15, with the unsampled portion of time considered to represent zero for the exposure calculation.  On 03/12/15, there was no change in operation identified from the date Line 4 Filler Area was initially observed on 12/01/14.     A temporary employee whose first exposure to noise above the action level on 09/13/13 and working at Line 5 was exposed to continuous noise up to 108.8% of the action level (AL) eight hour time-weighted average sound level on 85 dBA which is 2.2 times the allowable exposure limit, respectively.  The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 90.6 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 440 minutes on 02/27/15, with the unsampled portion of time considered to represent zero for the exposure calculation.    A temporary employee whose first exposure to noise above the action level on 01/02/13 and working at Line 2 Filler area was exposed to continuous noise up to 106.5% of the action level (AL) eight hour time-weighted average sound level on 85 dBA which is 2.1 times the allowable exposure limit, respectively.  The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 90.5 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 422 minutes on 02/27/15, with the unsampled portion of time considered to represent zero for the exposure calculation.     A temporary employee whose first exposure to noise above the action level on 08/20/13 and working at Rework area and Line 5 Labeling outcoming conveyor area was exposed to continuous noise up to 75.1% of the action level (AL) eight hour time-weighted average sound level on 85 dBA which is 1.5 times the allowable exposure limit, respectively.  The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 87.9 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 401 minutes on 03/12/15, with the unsampled portion of time considered to represent zero for the exposure calculation.    Violation occurred on or about 12/01/14, 02/27/15 and 03/12/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W) $45375
  • — Z (W) $60500

1910.95 G06

Willful Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels :   a) Facility   The employer did not obtain annual audiograms for all employees at or above the action level of 85 dbA as an 8 hour time-weighted average.   An employee (not provided 2013 and 2014 audiometric exam) working on the line as a filler on Line 6 was exposed to continuous noise up to 106.9% of the action level (AL) eight hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dbA which is 2.1 times the allowable exposure limit, respectively.  The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 90.5 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 440 minutes on 02/27/15, with the unsampled portion of time considered to represent zero for the exposure calculation.  On 02/27/15, there was no change in operation identified from the date Line 6 was initially observed on 12/01/14.   An employee (not provided 2013 and 2014 audiometric exam) working on the line as a casepacker on Line 3 was exposed to continuous noise up to 112.5% of the action level (AL) eight hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dbA which is 2.3 times the allowable exposure limit, respectively.  The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 90.8 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 427 minutes on 02/27/15, with the unsampled portion of time considered to represent zero for the exposure calculation.  On 02/27/15, there was no change in operation identified from the date Line 3 was initially observed on 12/01/14.   Violation occurred on or about 12/01/14.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W) $0
  • — Z (W) $0

1904.32 B06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2015
Abate by
Jun 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,100 · Current $825 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(6): The annual summary was not posted no later than February 1 of the year following the year covered by the records, and kept in place until April 30:    a) Facility    The annual summary for calendar year 2014 was not posted by February 1, 2015.    Violation observed on or about 03/09/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $825
  • — Z (O) $1100

View Whitlock Packaging Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340150754.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.