Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALBERT HUGO ASSOCIATES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ALBERT HUGO ASSOCIATES, INC. in 3139 PHILIPS HWY., JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207 (NAICS 337121). OSHA activity number 340187772.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Albert Hugo Associates, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Albert Hugo Associates, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3139 PHILIPS HWY.
City
JACKSONVILLE
State
FL
ZIP
32207
Mailing
3139 PHILIPS HWY., JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337121
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    a. On or about January 13, 2015, in the work shop, the Delta Unisaw did not have a guard on the point of operation, exposing employees to a amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.22 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition:  a. On or about January 13, 2015, in the work shop, the working areas contained accumulated amounts of saw dust, in that the working areas were not cleaned routinely nor maintained in a orderly and sanitary condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2015
Abate by
May 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate:  a. On or about January 13, 2015, in the workshop, the area above the break room where items were stored was not load tested, exposing employees to crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.334 A02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):  a. On or about January 13, 2015, connected to the portable table router, an electrical cord was not visibly inspected prior to usage, in that the cord was frayed and deformed, exposing employees to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 7, 2015
Abate by
May 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a. On or about January 13, 2015, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazardous communication program to outline how requirements 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g) and (h) would be met for employees who have exposure to hazardous material such as but not limited to: 451 Lacquer Thinner, Sher-wood water white conversion varnish and Ultra Max high solids precatalyzed lacquer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Albert Hugo Associates, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340187772.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.