MIAMI, FL —
OSHA Inspection: PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS OF FL, INC
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS OF FL, INC in 4070 NW 37TH COURT, MIAMI, FL 33142 (NAICS 562111). OSHA activity number 340201763.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS OF FL, INC
- Site address
- 4070 NW 37TH COURT
- City
- MIAMI
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33142
- Mailing
- 3840 NW 37TH COURT ATTN: CHRIS MARINO, MIAMI, FL 33142
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 562111
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.27 F
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.27(f): Ladders were not maintained in a safe condition or inspected regularly: On or about 1/23/2015, at the above addressed jobsite, a fixed ladder was defective while having bent rungs and being used by the baler operator to reach the platform for the baling machine.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.95 B01
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
8110
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized: Instances: a) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the C11 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at 169.7% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 94 dbA during the 448-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 32 minutes not sampled. b) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the OS113 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at 147.1% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 93 dbA during the 438-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 42 minutes not sampled. c) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the C108 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at 133.2% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 92 dbA during the 440-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 40 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: Instances: a) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the C19 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at 97.85% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90 dbA during the 452-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 28 minutes not sampled. b) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the OS113 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at 98.84% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90 dbA during the 442-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 38 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: Instances: a) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the C19 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at 97.85% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90 dbA during the 452-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 28 minutes not sampled. b) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the OS113 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at 98.84% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90 dbA during the 442-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 38 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 F02 I
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available after the employee had received the training required in 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(I) or within 10 working days of initial assignment to employees who had occupational exposure: On or about 1/23/15, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not provide the Hepatitis B vaccination to employees at the Material Recovery Facility (MRF) that received the bloodborne pathogens training or within 10 days of initial assignment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.1030 C01 IV
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually: On or about 1/23/15, at the above address jobsite, the employer had not reviewed and updated their bloodborne exposure control plan on an annual basis.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1030 C01 V
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan, did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control plan: On or about 1/23/2015, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not request and document the required input from employees exposed to bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Progressive Waste Solutions of FL, INC
View Progressive Waste Solutions of FL, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562111)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340201763.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.