Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS OF FL, INC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS OF FL, INC in 4070 NW 37TH COURT, MIAMI, FL 33142 (NAICS 562111). OSHA activity number 340201763.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Progressive Waste Solutions of FL, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Progressive Waste Solutions of FL, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4070 NW 37TH COURT
City
MIAMI
State
FL
ZIP
33142
Mailing
3840 NW 37TH COURT ATTN: CHRIS MARINO, MIAMI, FL 33142
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562111
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.27 F

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.27(f): Ladders were not maintained in a safe condition or inspected regularly:  On or about 1/23/2015, at the above addressed jobsite, a fixed ladder was defective while having bent rungs and being used by the baler operator to reach the platform for the baling machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.95 B01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8110

29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized:    Instances:    a) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the C11 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at 169.7% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 94 dbA during the 448-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 32 minutes not sampled.    b) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the OS113 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at 147.1% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 93 dbA during the 438-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 42 minutes not sampled.    c) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the C108 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at 133.2% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 92 dbA during the 440-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 40 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:      Instances:    a) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the C19 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at 97.85% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90 dbA during the 452-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 28 minutes not sampled.    b) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the OS113 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at  98.84% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90 dbA during the 442-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 38 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:  Instances:  a) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the C19 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at 97.85% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90 dbA during the 452-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 28 minutes not sampled.  b) On or about 3/9/15, at the above address jobsite, employees on the OS113 sorting line were exposed to continuous noise at  98.84% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90 dbA during the 442-minute sampling period on 03/09/15; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 38 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available after the employee had received the training required in 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(I) or within 10 working days of initial assignment to employees who had occupational exposure:     On or about 1/23/15, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not provide the Hepatitis B vaccination to employees at the Material Recovery Facility (MRF) that received the bloodborne pathogens training or within 10 days of initial assignment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.1030 C01 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually:    On or about 1/23/15, at the above address jobsite, the employer had not reviewed and updated their bloodborne exposure control plan on an annual basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1030 C01 V

Other-than-serious 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan, did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control plan:    On or about 1/23/2015, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not request and document the required input from employees exposed to bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Progressive Waste Solutions of FL, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340201763.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.