Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: APOLLO CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of APOLLO CONSTRUCTION in CAROLTON DRIVE, YIGO, GU 96929 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 340263524.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Apollo Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Apollo Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
APOLLO CONSTRUCTION
Site address
CAROLTON DRIVE
City
YIGO
State
GU
ZIP
96929
Mailing
P.O. BOX 8890, TAMUNING, GU 96931
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2015
Abate by
May 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training were met (Referenced in 29 CFR 1926.59):       a) On February 3,2015, a written hazard communication program was not developed for employees that worked with hazardous chemicals to include, but not limited to portland cement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.51 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2015
Abate by
Apr 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.51(f)(1): The employer did not provide adequate washing facilities for employees engaged in the application of paints, coatings, herbicides, or insecticides, or in other operations where contaminants may be harmful to the employees.  Such facilities were not in near proximity to the worksite and was not equipped as to enable employees to remove such substances:   a) On February 3, 2015, no soap and no hand towels or other drying methods available for employees that used portland cement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.701 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2015
Abate by
Apr 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement:   a) On February 3, 2015, on the perimeter of the house, approximately 100 3/8 inch diameter rebar protruded were not guarded against impalement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Apollo Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340263524.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.